Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ah, forgot about prestige classes. Good catch.
Very well done. If I was the OP I would very much find this scenario helpful even if it could be countered. At the end of the day it lends one to think of possibilities.
They were usually either comically broken or hysterically impractical from what I hear.
Yup.
That's one thing I love about having an established setting and lore for the races, if the player can give me a good enough reason when I'm the DM for why they want a race to be a class that normally wouldn't fit then I'm all for it.
My scenario would also help explain Vaelis having unique Githyanki dialogue options because she would have been raised in a creche and knew how to act and what was expected of her while her upbringing as a druid would help her have all the other dialogue options.
I personally think it would be great if a llolth-sworn cleric, moving to the drow, should be able to have more deities than llolth, and if you are a male have all the options BUT Llolth, because that is what the lore says.
But ah well.
Yeah, I was very much not a fan of them, which is partially why I forgot they existed just now.
Bro, you stated Lloth doesn't allow female warriors therefore no paladins, which is pretty out there, because they're two different classes then you said if a title was unworthy of a female, it's not worthy for a male. Which is absurd because not every lady that worships lloth is a cleric or a wizard. Also you're the first person I've heard say that Drow women Lloth followers can't be warriors.
You are making a series of leaps of logic worthy of the olympics.
I think that's only the case if you got into the math or numbers of it. Outside of that the options it created and the cool factor of those classes was amazing and one of the big things about 3.5 that made it popular. People love more options that expand the imagination.
The push back comes where you remove the options while selling it as this new package of where anything can be everything within the basic confines of the base classes. While it may dampen complexity it also creates less depth particularly from those who don't think of D&D as a game without boundaries where anything and everything is possible or that don't want to spend time fleshing out the ideas of the player that came to the table with the ideas of an Elven Bladesinger when it could already be done for them or whose imaginations aren't able to conceive ideas like those themselves.
Wrong that's not what I said. Please go back and read. No where did I say that Lolth does not allow female warriors. Start there.
Oh I see what you're saying is that Lloth holds Paladins in too high a regard to allow a female warrior to become one, let alone a male warrior, which logically means since she considers it prestigious, she would totally allow women to be paladins. It's too prestigious for the boys though.
No what I'm saying is that she thinks of warriors in the way that a CEO thinks of custodians. Yes the building needs to be cleaned but does she value them as she does the President of the company? No... not by any means in fact she barely notices they exist other than to perform a function.
Paladins are considered Holy warriors or warriors of the faith. Read page 82 of the 5e PHB. The description listed their alone would explain another big wrench in an evil god having Paladins but I'm not even going there...
Where I'm going with this is the fact that a goddess who does not value warriors as anything certainly wouldn't then take said thing and create an elevation of it. Like why? It would be like having a Sr. Custodian.
Yes. This is how 5E is too. Key to this idea is you tell your story.
1, Senior Custodians are a thing and they are respected.
2. Paladins are oath based in 5e, if the paladin follows an oath that doesn't conflict with Lloth's teachings, it's cool. Now you CAN make an argument that an oath of devotion or ancients order of paladins would be a bad fit for Lloth's faith. Glory and conquest? Hell, half of Menzoberranzan is practically on those oaths already. Paladins in 5e don't draw their power from a specific god, it's about the oath, even oathbreakers still have paladin powers. Could a drow male be a fervent Lloth worshiper and become a Paladin in her name while following a compatible oath? That's up to the GM to decide. How you run your campaign, well, that's your call.
In addendum: I remember reading the Finder's stone trilogy and thinking it was the dumbest thing that halflings couldn't be bards, what the hell? Race class restrictions are ridiculous, if you can make a halfway decent argument as to why a combo should exist, that's fine.
3. Seriously, respect the custodians, most of the increase in human life expectancy can be attributed to living in more hygienic conditions. You live longer and better thanks to them.
Honestly probably the best answer imo. If you can explain it in a way that makes sense within the boundaries of whatever the DM uses as rules then you would most likely find that it's possible. Often times the DM will even bend the rules a bit to allow for something that wouldn't normally be the case in the rule set if you have a compelling story to tell.
A far better answer than "Just because" or "Then don't make one".
You're getting lost in your own need to make a point.
The idea isn't to flesh out the importance of custodians the idea is how the profession is perceived in the general public particularly as the head of a company. Not how specific individuals may percieve it.
Once you understand that then you can understand how small that is to a Goddess.
It's also obvious you didn't read the PHB. Your answer is right there with regard to Paladins. Take that a step further and read the hierarchy of Lolth sworn society and that closes the book on the possibility of a Paladin outside of some "I created one just because" scenario.
Unlike the Gith, Lolth sworn drow have a very in depth lore and very specific and unique societal characteristics so it's next to impossible to create a scenario where certain things such as the whole male cleric thing as an example would be possible and actually make sense.