Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And by the way --- spoiler--- if you kill the momma owlbear the cub stops being hostile ----spoiler end----, something to keep in mind the next time.
If you do not like it, Multiclass Fighter / Cleric for nearly the same abilities.
PS : Oath of Vengeance is very hard to break if don't let any evil go unjudged.
It will still be hostile if you start a fight in the goblin camp. Summoning the ogres to help in the fight, and them killing a HOSTILE creature breaks my oath, very dumb.
So yeah totally agree its too easy. No option in combat to try to talk it out. I'm pretty convident that if I had of fled from the fight the outcome would have been the same because that would have broken the courage of Tennent.
If they want your oath to be affected by other players' actions then you should have the ability to interject and disagree.
However I wouldn't be adverse to Larian bringing in the Oath of Glory which would sidestep the issue of falling even more than Vengeance does.
If I swore a binding magical oath, I would simply follow its tenets. Just make the choice to be morally correct.
Or pay the fine and keep all your powers anyway, I guess.
paladins should've never be changed to any "oath" or what nonsense and should've stayed deity-bound as they are in 3e, but .. that's a long story.