Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
1280x720 (looks just as good as 1280x800, just small borders on the top and bottom...not a big deal).
mix of medium and ultra settings. the important ones are ultra quality amd fsr and tsaa.
capped the framerate to 30. it's playable if you cap at 40, but i prefer the stability of just 30.
constant 30 fps, except for highly populated areas (goblin camp with dip into the high 20s when theres a lot of goblins on screen) and the dialogue scenes will dip momentarily sometimes.
this is perfectly acceptable for a handheld imo. i also preordered the ps5 version for the cross save capability later on :)
Plus, let's not forget that the Steam Deck is a handheld PC with specs many times lower than even BG3's minimum system requirements. The fact that it runs at all is kind of a miracle.
Everyone lying to you is just playing the tutorial or a fanboy. Claiming steady 30fps on mid preset is just a lie.
At the end of act 1 on lowest settings you cant even keep 20fps in the underdark and grymforge. Fps there goes down to 15-20 and you have to be there for hours. I almost abandoned the game there due to being almost unplayable but paying full price without a chance to refund kept me going.
Its so funny to see people not understanding the problem here. Its not about the Steam deck Performance. I know the decks is weak, cant handle most new games and will be sold soon once i find a good laptop.
The problem is that the game is being labled "verified". That clearly gives a wrong impression of the game. This is wrong advertisiment. You dont expect that performance on a verified game. Barely running on 15-30 fps is not a verified game.
And once you get out of the tutorial and character creation, you realize how bad this game is actually running. But you are way past the 2 hour refund mark...
I played it on Steam Deck and with tempered expectations it is fine, using fine in a loose sense. BG3 is a demanding game so the graphics are very low but again you are running it on a handheld, what are you expecting. The control layout for controller is actually much better than expected; surprisingly surpassed expectations albeit mouse and keyboard still better but I wouldn't mind running the game on controller on a PC.
Verified status is deserved as long as people understand what graphic performance should be on a handheld. And the settings auto revert to Steam Deck settings so it is actually playable out of the box without any fiddling. Not sure whats wrong with your Steam Deck, try updating it.
Have you reached moonrise tower or ACT 3 yet? The game is fine on deck for the first chapter, in dungeons and emptier parts of ACT 2, but the heavily crowded areas of ACT 2 and Baldur's Gate itself are not even fine. The game cannot hold solid 30 in the more demanding areas.
Necro or not it's still a relevant topic. The performance on Deck is substandard. and FSR2 isn't going to help because it's a CPU bottleneck not a GPU one. If anything FSR2 is only going make it worse, because GPU wasn't the issue in the first place.