Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Aren't Tieflings planetouched? The plane being hell?
I mean as per the lore in one of the journals, i think Ketheric is a paladin of Shar
Yeah, at one point he was. He got around. I guess Oathbreaker is basically the same...
This describes 90% of the complaints on these forums.
There are evil Paladins in D&D; in older editions they were called 'Antipaladins'.
I do agree that this should have been an option when they allow you to play evil characters, and have an evil protag route (Dark Urge). Probably, it wasn't allowed because they don't want you being part of Shadowheart's storyline as an insider.
I mean, they might have some form of fiend blood in their ancestry somewhere but that does not make them evil. I can't find anything about tieflings not being able to be paladins?
Oh wait, the other guy (which my team brutally massacred). Who is..human.. but working for Zariel.
oathbraker paladins under asmodeus and under zariel by proxy. as a dm is just npc magic, like you cannot be a lich or turn into a god, but an npc can.
remember asmodeus is a god. its portafolio are lies, machinations and being evil, zariel works under asmodeus in the hierarchy, if they made a deal with zariel they can get oaths under asmodeus sight, mechanically oathbrakers.
Because now you choose an Oath and no longer a diety in 5E.