Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Shouldn't then the weapon disappear? That would make more sense and it will be a good reminder, current system is a bit confusing for people not proficient with 5e warlock rules
Tome is completely ruined, and this is just like "welp might as well not even have a pact" level of incompetent design.
This thread is from August. I wonder if they still need help. Whenever someone had the mentioned issue it is just that they forgot to
a) bind their weapon to be a pact weapon
b) forgot that the extra attack only applies to the pact weapon, unlike with other classes where type of attack can have an extra attack
though, there is a bug which allows you to have an extra attack despite note using the pact weapon...