Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
But I know I tend to want to be in control of the narrative, and would end up trying to get the 'perfect playthrough'.
Because of that, I am planning to play a more morally ambiguous feylock, for my very first playthrough, to try to get around that, so I can esperience the whole game quicker, without redoing parts. Just gonna do whatever I think would be interesting in each situation.
And, of course, I just have to do a proper Dark Urge run as well.
Later I definitely want to try both good Dark Urge and evil Dark Urge.
I will probably avoid using tadpoles altogether tho.
Seriously, I prefer the tables where it's all about reputation of the perception from what someone did, because determining what someone intended by alignment is murkier than soft concrete.
I'll take each situation as it happens instead of trying to fit into some (vague) idea of alignment.
Second playthrough will be 'chaotic evil'.