Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not sure why Larian would do this...the only explanations I can come up with is that they are morons and did not realize they were gimping those races (seems unlikely) or they are deliberately steering people away from those races, which seems very on brand for them.
No, that is one of the reasons people would pick a dwarf or a githyanki wizard, because of the proficiencies with medium armor or the weapon proficiencies. It made for varied and interesting builds but came with tradeoff associated with the lack of intelligence (for dwarves at least), but you could still specialize your dwarf to use magic as a wizard.
It was a system of trade-offs and bounded accuracy in 5E made it so the trade-offs weren't crippling and wouldn't handicap your character, they were just big enough to be noticed but small enough not to matter.
Now, racial traits without any of the racial stats means that the trade-off has been removed entirely and races can now be quantified as being objectively better or objectively worse than other races.
Lol that’s doublespeak for “we don’t want all rogues being X race or fighter/barbs being Y race”.
And as a result of the changes roleplay has become the ONLY reason to play as a human.
It is confirmed that Humans get pole arm and light armor proficiency as well as +20 carry capacity and half elves got nothing.
They're better by degrees of grains of sand, and do have some potentially useful traits like shields.
You are again also ignoring my comment about race-locked magic items, items which you'd never find in actual DnD and which are good enough to literally build around.
You're just drowning in ignorance, crossing your arms, pouting, and throwing a tantrum. If you want to narrow your vision down to character selection and a specific definition of strong (ignoring stuff like human wizards getting light armor and shields for free for instance), then yes mate, humans are the worst race ever.
Oh woe is you that your super specific definition of power has been thwarted, guess there's a gun to your head and you'll have to play one of the other many races...? The horror, I know.
Somehow, I know a brave chad like you will survive while millions literally laugh at you and pick human anyway.
Yeah, that's dumb.
Because no one is going to stop saying the word "races" after years of using it just because WotC got a stick up their butt about it being racist to say "race".
It still doesn't change the fact that races do, in fact, have advantages over other races by virtue of the racial traits. Without the racial stats it means that the races with the most usable or most often used racial traits are objectively better than the races that have fewer and/or less used racial traits.
There has been speculation that Monks can use any weapon they're proficient with as a monk weapon in BG3, which would be huge boon for the class.
It's just non-heavy/2hand weapons, that's not new.
Greatsword monk weapon thanks to githyanki! (2d6 damage).
Yup.