Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In game it appears to be thus as well.
Jeremy Crawford can say what he wants. He makes the games, the players fix them.
and the spell creates an additional dart for each spell slot above the first
so yeah its 1D4 for each missile
https://roll20.net/compendium/dnd5e/Magic%20Missile#content
https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/magic-missile
Separate rolls all the way.
Rules as Written, Rules as Interpreted be damned, how about Fun as a Rule.
Less pedantically, it's technically faster to roll one single die and apply that to all darts (kinda like rolling damage and attack at the same time), and some prefer the more extreme damage range instead of the more bell curved average result of multiple die rolls.
I'm firmly in the each dart gets a separate roll camp, myself.
Only skinwalkers do that. If your friend in your TTRPG group does that, they ain't your friend.
Oh, whoops the party is dead because I rolled a 6.
The DM's for both campaigns don't tend to 'house rules' anything unless there's a good reason to. This being one of those things where it hardly matters either way, they went with official ruling.
personally, if I was still DM'ing, I'd have stuck with separate rolls for each missile, simply because that is more satisfying to the player (imo).
The only reason why Crawford still have a Job at WotC is cause he's gay and he would play the Gay Victime card so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Fast, the Legal team at WotC wouldn't know what hit them.
He's a buffoon that half of the time doesn't know what he says and is constantly contradicting himself.
It doesn't work that way, he would need to be able to provide actual evidence that his sexual preferences had anything to do with him being fired.
Washington is an 'at will' employment state, which means employers can fire you for any, or even no, reason. The burden of proof that a protected status was a factor is on the person making the claim.
I've been in management for the past 30 years, and the number of employees that have 'tried' to file claims against me for firing them due to race, gender or sexuality would boggle your mind. Not once did a single one of those claims make it to court.
The only time I even had to do anything was once I needed to go to the courthouse to deliver some data that the court requested, before the case was just summarily tossed for having no merit.
I assure you, the fact that he's gay is not a factor and if they wanted to fire him because he's a buffoon, they would. Ergo, that means they don't want to fire him.
Plus if you do that here, what's to stop people doing for higher dice spells like fireball (for those that don't remember for 8d6 you don't actually roll higher than 39, as the chances are virtually 0.01% to get past that)...
The only thing that rule is going to do is yet again nerf spell damage to the ground (becasue we will get damage values that are normally impossible to get with a correct roll) and the ones that will suffer will those that roll the correct way.
Next edition they'll jsut remove damage dice for spells and you'll just roll one die for hit that you'll multiply by a fixed amount of damage (like 1d4* spell level), and it's going to be boring as hell.