Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
good.
Question number one: Pathfinder Kingmaker has been famously accused of being woke propaganda. Would you describe BG3 more, or less woke than its competitor?
I see what you did there mate :D
Like the way you are thinking, but keep in mind that Owlcat devs are Russian and I'm not even sure the concept of wokeness even exists there. I'll give you half points.
This is liberalism.
Total freedom for money holders and theirs few servants.
They want to be kings and they want to have slaves.
There are not right answers, there are only wrong answers and wrong answers than get points.
Question number 2: As we all know, the following excerpt
"We all know you're just salty you bought a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ SJW game, which wouldn't even be worth it at half the price. Keep telling yourself it's not a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ propaganda game, and maybe you'll actually start feeling like that one day ;)"
is referring to Disco Elysium, so the question is this. Did BG3 even had a chance with these people?