Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Usually seen in television and film to ensure the well-being of actors during very personal, intimate scenes. Basically to ensure no one is harassed or made uncomfortable, that everyone involved is aware and consenting to what is happening, to ensure direct communication to director about concerns/issues, previously agreed upon choreography is maintained, etc.
From a certain point of view the necessity to have "intimacy coordinators" can be seen as pruddishness, but I'm always willing to listen to counterarguments.
Intimacy Coordinators are just there to ensure nothing inappropriate happens and ensure the safety and consent is maintained. They have no say on what does/doesn't happen in said scenes. They just act as a middle man to express concerns if anything.
What are you on about? This is industry standard in pretty much everything but games, it's basically the equivalent of stunt coordinators but for intimate scenes.
The only reason it is being brought up is because it isn't usually needed in games, because the scenes are usually computer generated and not motion captured.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.
I agree that in the current climate (society wise) intimacy coordinators are a good solution, it just bothers me that we're still having issues with human sexuality.
Don't get me wrong here, please... it's just that I was hoping for a "fully liberated world" when I was young, not "oh, this whole sexuality thing is so problematic, we actually need people to coordinate intimacy for us".
Context is king. ;-)
That is alot more responsibility then the name implies, it does sound like a director just for sex scenes. Clearly not.
Intimacy coordinators aren't the result of sexuality being "problematic" it's the result to ensure better protections are in place for people.
This actually sounds very good. I was wrong, probably. Thank you.
Ok, there's the connection. The harassers are the problem, thats logically sound.
Interesting concept to reinterpret reality for me. Maybe I should have slept more this night, but cat woke me up because she wanted food.