Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Still, 5e is well-known for being designed around simplicity. It's not too difficult to pick it up and at least understand the fundamentals after a bit.
They also translate much better to games where every class will be too busy using different abilities and moves in battle instead of just spamming attacks and watching a log saying whether or not they have missed, or killed the target in a single hit.
Absolutely yes!
You don't even need to have played the two previous Baldur's Gate games either.
It's just well made so that if you DO have D'n'D knowledge or previous Baldur's Gate Game knowledge, you'll probably get more out of it, but there's still plenty to fall in love with for us non d'n'd people too!
And tbh, BG3 is less fiddly than D:OS2 with its classless format, so if you were into that, BG3 should be no problem.
The main difference between D&D games and other RPG's is you'll be able to physically see the numbers and buffs to a check instead of just seeing "70% chance" on something. Though that does show in combat for player ease.
Vietnam, we have video games and internet since the 90, 200x (for middleclass mostly) but boardgames were totally unheard of (it might different now).