Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
BG3 is almost certainly three acts long, but each act is likely significantly longer than the chapters of the original games. I'd estimate total completion time as comparable to that of BG1-2, give or take depending on how difficult you find the game. Certainly north of 100 hours.
Larian has gone on record to say BG3 is bigger then they expected it to be when they first started making it so i could see 200-300 hours worth of content if you were to do every little thing and get as close to a 100% run as you can considering some choices will lock you out of certain things based on what we got in EA.
Sure you CAN spend 1000 hours in a playthrough, some have spend 1000+ hours repeating the act 1 alone but that's not a reasonable presentation of the content.
Even assuming that on the other hand the third will be the shortest and straight to the conclusion, that puts the game in the 80-100 hours ballpark, conservatively, for a completinist run.
Of course, experienced players are going to be able to rush toward these three acts on a much shorter timeframe, but that's hardly a good frame of reference for these types of games.
Maybe he has a time machine!
How would anyone know that the final act is any better or worse? They would not. So lets not discuss people's nonsense assumptions.