安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I agree, we should stop consuming dairy and instead start consuming more beef.
BUT.... if they did lol all the more power to them they deserve that darwin award honestly rofl
Its not a warebear or a real bear its a druid who can shapeshift, also this is a world where one can use a spell to speak with animals, this world gives more agencgy to creatures then the real world. Although the animals are very simplistic in nature of speech but still you need to think in this worlds logic not our own, no one is gonna think its okay to do this we all know thats wrong, its hardly something that needs to be taught we just know it. AND if it does i refer to the above point for that 1 brave soul xD
Personally, I wish Larian didn't actually add the scene in or at the very least left it up to 'innuendo'. Even though it's always been a sort of 'in-joke' for the DnD community, I think it's a little too much to actually add a scene with that. i won't be pursuing that scene as I'm not into that ♥♥♥♥, but I still laughed my ass off at the sheer shock of it.
No its not because I would have an issue with Marketing having shown this during a Live Stream with any Animal Form, be it Wolf, Bear, Deer, or anything else.
You do understand the meaning of fictional or fantasy, do you?
Yes I do, but I also have the right to express what I see as an issue. I love how you just keep throwing out things at me like its somehow going to get me to change my mind, or get me in a "Gotcha" Moment.
Yes I have issues with Realistic Animal Forms being depicted that way. I also already stated I have issues with any Undead Banging. I have also said I dont want it Censored or Banned, just have issues with How Marketing showed it during the Stream.
I have no idea why you are so upset with me expressing all this.
"If we allow consensual sex between two characters, next they'll have non-consensual sex between characters and even children!!!" is quite the hot take, but okay.
Ah yeah, so what if the shapeshifter can transform himself into a body of 8 years old boy, and you can choose the same option??? Is this excuse also works then???
Have a read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Edit: I really need a template/makro for this...
Hello, Rhila.
The answer to your concerns is simple: context matters.
Let me illustrate. If someone much older causes a teenage girl to become pregnant, should that not cause moral outrage? Would you not call that person a pedophile? But... what if the person insists that there was no lust involved? That he has no attraction to children? That he only acted to create offspring? Is he still a pedophile?
What if I told you the person in question is God and the teenager was a young girl named Mary?
Does context matter? I am sure we can both agree that it is harmful to children to present them with stories glorifying pedophiles.
So how is teaching children the Bible acceptable?
The same way Balder's Gate III is acceptable. Context.