Annoyed that one of the female "romance" options is Lae’zel

[bonds7]

So, all the dudes are attractive, but then we get Lae’zel who is not only ugly, she is annoyingly rude and will simp you and sleep around with others because that is her races culture. On top of that, ALL the female characters require you to be selfish or evil to some extent, while two out of three of the guys require you to be good. Who thought this was a good idea? Its just wasted since I doubt many people will romance her. They should have picked another race and character for a romance and companion character.

[Clynol]

how can you complain about Bae’zel shes the best romance option in the game.

[LinkToReality.ttv]

Reminder that you don't have to romance every possible option.

[bonds7]

Originally posted by ⎛⎝Link⎠⎞:

Reminder that you don't have to romance every possible option.

Its not about not romancing them, so much that its about how its makes it unbalanced that one of them is wasted as a romance option instead of having a better character.

[Lord Adorable]

Originally posted by bonds7:

Originally posted by ⎛⎝Link⎠⎞:

Reminder that you don't have to romance every possible option.

Its not about not romancing them, so much that its about how its makes it unbalanced that one of them is wasted as a romance option instead of having a better character.

"Better character" have you played the full game already or something?

[everybe2]

Females are evil, so what did you expect?

[Edstyles]

Could be worse. Could be pathfinder where the female options are very bad.

At least you got Laezel , Shadowheart , Minthara and Karlach and maybe others who knows.

Thats allready better options than Pathfinder ever had.

[Lord Adorable]

Originally posted by Edstyles:

Could be worse. Could be pathfinder where the female options are very bad.

At least you got Laezel , Shadowheart , Minthara and Karlach and maybe others who knows.

Thats allready better options than Pathfinder ever had.

Pathfinder had likeable romance options? News to me.

Even the succubus was awkwardly written with the uh.. QUESTIONS you could ask her.

[Edstyles]

Isnt that what i said? Hate when people quote for no reason :p

[Manta]

I don't think people intend to romance Lae'zel because of her looks.

Besides, we got Shadowheart.
What is it with gamers complaining about having more options.

[Battler]

Although I am also dissatisfied with the romanceable females (gityanka and barbarian-tiefling are big NO for me), but at least we have 2 other options. In pathfinder, we have only cutie Arueshalae. All the others: a maniac, a cannibal and an old woman with the self-control of a child.

[EMT-Fields]

Speak for yourself. I still can't decide between Lae'zel or Karlach. I really enjoy Lae'zel, and that aggressive behavior is more of a turn on. My only gripe is she may sleep around.

[thufirhawat333]

Originally posted by ⎛⎝Link⎠⎞:

Reminder that you don't have to romance every possible option.

Wrong. If you play a Bard, you kinda have to.

[Butcher]

Originally posted by Lord Adorable:

Originally posted by Edstyles:

Could be worse. Could be pathfinder where the female options are very bad.

At least you got Laezel , Shadowheart , Minthara and Karlach and maybe others who knows.

Thats allready better options than Pathfinder ever had.

Pathfinder had likeable romance options? News to me.

Even the succubus was awkwardly written with the uh.. QUESTIONS you could ask her.

Queen is not too bad. She was okay enough with making you crusade commander.

[Anna]

but there is always Halsin... :D

[Brian Sirith]

Dont think Shadowheart or Karsomething are evil