Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There is a TON of fun stuff to do (sometimes even a little bit too much) and it runs very smoothly for me.
If you liked Portia you might love this game.
And I wouldn't it consider expensive in comparison what you get if you into that kind of game.
As for "will they do more with it", most likely. They did with the first game in the series but it was some time after the "full" release and the game was fine to play before those extras were added.
I feel like any content they add now will be end game stuff and to complete the story will take a good 70-100hrs.
I have played through most of EA and MOST Major Content Drop (Skipped Sept since Starrfield and 1.0 was a few months away).
Portia is a lot more chill than Sandrock. There seems to be a lot less "play" in Sandrock and a lot more running/racing around. The platforming in Sandrock is more time sensitive and they added hidden object quests to the main questline.
I do prefer the gardening in Sandrock and the pets are cute. I probably would have loved the housing as well but honestly, I just found Sandrock too tedious and un-fun to persevere. I wasn't playing Sandrock because I was drawn into the story line or enjoying the game - I was playing Sandrock because I "trying to get to the fun part". But I just never got there.
Sandrock leaves much less up to the player. It's very much directed by the devs. It feels a lot more linear and less exploratory.