Anybody knows what´s the game engine?

[Zacarías Satrústegui]

I hope it´s not Unity.

[uncle nick]

HG game engine.

[Zacarías Satrústegui]

Originally posted by uncle nick:

HG game engine.

I am so glad of that. Thanks for answering.

[SirHawk]

Originally posted by Zacarias Satrústegui:

Originally posted by uncle nick:

HG game engine.

I am so glad of that. Thanks for answering.

And what difference does it make to you?

[Darkeus]

Originally posted by SirHawk:

Originally posted by Zacarias Satrústegui:

I am so glad of that. Thanks for answering.

And what difference does it make to you?

Because Unity has proven to be POS and people may not want to support them or worry about any fallout from Unity's stupidity??

What a dumb question lol.

[Zacarías Satrústegui]

Originally posted by Darkeus:

Originally posted by SirHawk:

And what difference does it make to you?

Because Unity has proven to be POS and people may not want to support them or worry about any fallout from Unity's stupidity??

What a dumb question lol.

All of that and this:


Death to the zombies!!!

[SirHawk]

Originally posted by Darkeus:

Originally posted by SirHawk:

And what difference does it make to you?

Because Unity has proven to be POS and people may not want to support them or worry about any fallout from Unity's stupidity??

What a dumb question lol.

Unity has proven to be PoS to developers not content consumers, gamers don't have to give a rat ass about what engine is being used, as all of the recent borderline illegal crapiness would concern only the developers. Adding a second depth to that is what's actually dumb, not my question.

[Zacarías Satrústegui]

Originally posted by SirHawk:

Originally posted by Darkeus:

Because Unity has proven to be POS and people may not want to support them or worry about any fallout from Unity's stupidity??

What a dumb question lol.

Unity has proven to be PoS to developers not content consumers, gamers don't have to give a rat ass about what engine is being used, as all of the recent borderline illegal crapiness would concern only the developers. Adding a second depth to that is what's actually dumb, not my question.

Is not like that because if devs have to pay for something they didn´t a while ago then they may remove their games as happened already to some of them which will be removed 1st of January the next year. Even so, if they remain to stay the increase in costs won´t be on their shoulders only and will affect the gamers too, most probably.

So, I wouldn´t say your question was dumb, but this that I expose sounds like answers it.

[SirHawk]

Originally posted by Zacarias Satrústegui:

[...]then they may remove their games as happened already to some of them which will be removed 1st of January the next year.[...]

That is actually a valid concern, although Unity had made changes to their initial pricing changes. Still, they're left with probably zero credibility whatsoever.

[Furin]

@SirHawk Who do you think will be paying in the end?

[Shuri-Sama]

Originally posted by Zacarias Satrústegui:

I hope it´s not Unity.

unity is more for cheap made chinese mobile games or some simple selfmade games. that nothing for a professional game company.

[Ketzerfreund]

The idea that I as a customer shouldn't care, if a developer gets ♥♥♥♥♥♥ over, says a lot about the character of the person proposing it. I, for my part, do care, because for one I might want a developer I like to thrive, but also because generally I try not to be an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

[lx]

i never liked unity and i think, this will not change

[LotR[Henchman]]

Originally posted by Shuri-Sama:

Originally posted by Zacarias Satrústegui:

I hope it´s not Unity.

unity is more for cheap made chinese mobile games or some simple selfmade games. that nothing for a professional game company.

And yet some very popular games were made with it.
Rimworld, Valheim, V-Rising, Wasteland, Owlcats RPG, Disco Elysium...

[SirHawk]

Originally posted by Ketzerfreund:

The idea that I as a customer shouldn't care, if a developer gets ♥♥♥♥♥♥ over, says a lot about the character of the person proposing it. I, for my part, do care, because for one I might want a developer I like to thrive, but also because generally I try not to be an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Of course, you're certainly helping a developer by not purchasing his product he gets revenue from anyway. You like soy milk, don't you?

Where are people like you coming from, I swear.

[Zacarías Satrústegui]

The main concern here as SirHawk points out is the lose of trust. One can´t trust to initiate a project where Darth Donatello whatever his name is ( the CEO who sold Unity shares just before this brilliant idea ), can change the terms one day or another.

Btw I read in a developers site that they went as far as REMOVING the TOS of Github for Unity. I mean, you don´t need much more to know who are managing Unity in this moment.