Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Would be nice if they would remake 1&2 to current graphics and OS's so we can play them again in current time, but yeah doubt that will happen.
JA1, JA2 and JA3 are 3 very different games, none invalidate the other,.
To start JA3 should be the best first pick in the sense that it will suit to much more contemporary Tactical or Tactical RPG players.
But past it, if you like tactical games, JA1 and JA2 are must play. For JA1&2 you need go over the graphics, if you play indies games, it shouldn't be difficult.
For JA2 the most ambitious of the 3 if I remind well, you need also go over a cumbersome UI and slow turns play. Moreover as quoted post above with modern windows it will have crash problems (unlike JA1).
For JA1, the most difficult, pick Easy, save often, you'll need a serious mastering and learning before be able make an ironman play, there's some cool let play showing ironman plays. I played some years ago JA1 Gold and had a ton of fun (with JA3 too, very different) but I saved often and had to reload often (no scamload).
JA BIA is real time with pause. While your paused you can also plan out everyones moves or even multiple squads moves and hit play. It also has a much better inventory system then the new game. You can buy gear online and outfit your mercs how you want. (No mercs running around in shorts). You can buy and attach things to your weapons and so on. Not sure why they didnt use this type of system in JA3 to be honest. Id recommend watching a playthrough as well to get an idea.
As for JA1.. I don't know.. JA2 is one of my favourite games of all time but even I can't stand the graphics of JA1. It's really dated by now.
Jagged Alliance 2 on the other hand is an outstanding game, made even better with the 1.13 mod which expands on almost every aspect of the game. JA2 you can still play today without getting outright eye cancer - i does look a bit dated it has enough details to still work visually.
The game really didn't age well at all. Very clunky and I kept missing QOL improvements from JG3 way too much.
Tried JA1 again few months ago and I got eyecancer, can't play it, it's just too dated.
But I would give JA2 and JA2 unfinished business a try.
Then again, JA3 is really good and the deeper conversations are fun to watch, mechanics of JA2 were partially better.
BiA is principally wrong, real time combat based on time-left-for-action and tons of unimaginably incoherent and untested micromanagement makes it unplayable. Just avoid it completely.
I mean I started playing PC games with Diablo (96) and Fallout (97) and I cannot play JA1 because it looks ancient/prehistoric/disgusting compared to those games.
And they are just a year or two newer.
At least JA2 already had Fallout level graphics so it was perfectly playable for me. Although today, I am glad JA3 exists.
You can actually just point your gun at the lock and blow most locks open. There's a lot of micro, but very fun indeed. Almost every building part is destructible so if you have enemies holed up in a building, just plant C-4 behind them and open new doors (aka big gaping holes) where you want it.
"Back in action" really lacks what JA2 had, back in action is more of a scroller-shooter than it is a JA franchise. I didn't even finish back in action.