Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think they're trying to use a line from a prior game to throw shade at this entry which still hasn't officially released.
1. No, JA3 isn't the JA2 gameplay.
2. JA3 has still many more gameplay elements coming from JA1&2 than other JA games after JA2.
3. Through all tactical games I played in last decade, none are similar to JA3 even less to JA2.
More clear?
And you can't understand it? Good joke.
Moreover reference of not, this OP is still saying JA3 is no JA game, read better.
“They will kill every one of us!”
God what in the hell are you saying?
Oh feck it, nvm.
Google translator sucks sometimes, just learn the language dude. You sound very confusing...