Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I actually personally like Super Paper Mario, but not so much for the gameplay, but for the very good story. The Origami King doesn't even have that much IMO. Bad game play, story mostly based on "everything is made of paper and we are going to remind you of that fact with every other sentence". Everything that they tried to put in the game as a concession to the fans was done in a very half hearted way with the exception of the overworld. It's actually pretty nice and well connected. The partners aren't partners, they are there for mostly bad paper puns. You can't control them in battle, and they fail their attacks 90% of the time they get a chance. The remaining 90% of the time you one shot ever monster you come across. There is just so much wrong with it, and I regret having played it honestly.
I won't be giving them a cent until they make either TTYD HD, or a game in that vein. Heck, even Super Paper Mario for all of its flaws felt like it was in the same series as the first two. Stinker Star, Color Trash, and King of Disappointment are just wearing the name of a once great series.
On a more positive note, I'm adoring the Bug Fables journey! The difficulty is in the right spot with so many great things pulled from the early games be it the chef, the quests, to reading enemies (I'm so grateful all of the characters can do this). They seem to have a handle of what made the original games solid both story-wise and mechanic-wise and built upon it. I look forward to dancing between this game and FFXIV to get my good story fix, haha.
I'm thinking that is the main reason most reviewers are giving TOK such high praise. Also, I've noticed tons of attacks on people who are fans of the originals. One guy "RGT85" going so far as to call original fans "cultists". I lost a lot of respect for him in that video.
SuperMarioT gave the game a positive review, but he like many older fans pointed out the many flaws, yet still said "yeah, it is pretty good". He kept bringing up "this is just my honest opinion". It felt more like he was trying to justify that to himself rather than the audience. Arlo hasn't gotten a full review, but said he was enjoying things so far. Those two are probably the most famous I know of who speak out against the current Paper Mario franchise.
I'm trying to go through my back log, while also playing multiplayer stuff with friends. I'm looking forward to the next big Warframe update as well. It does an interesting story that keeps me coming back, even if it is a bit grindy.
Also, I played so many games from my childhood that are nowhere near as good as I remember them or don't hold up today, and the first two Paper Mario games, especially The Thousand Year Door, hold up much better than they have any right to and exceeded my personal expectations.
I've only seen one person give an argument that I can respect for them liking the newest game. A video on Youtube called "How I Learned to Love Paper Mario Again" by Garrulous64. I disagree with this person highly, and have plenty of counterpoints to what was said. Garrulous64 does seem to agree that the series would be much better if they just removed the creative restrictions that Kensuke Tanabe mentions, and that are likely enforced by Shigeru Miyamoto.
Even on that channels comments section a person flat out told me they didn't believe me when I said I had tried the game, and found it to be incredibly disappointing even when going in with the knowledge it was different than TTYD.