Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
TL;DR Vanilla game is good, but the DLC adds so much more variety and fun to the experience.
Thanks for the info, looks like some of these verieties should of been part of the vanilla, since by the look of things vanilla is super super simplistic....Might play it once or 2 times and get bored of it. Ill research it a bit further...thanks.
The Europe map is an interesting variant - stations mean your route doesn't have to be completely built by you and the tunnels are a chance to take a risk. It's the third most played version on the online server.
You can live without the other two. The Switzerland map is best for face-to-face play with a couple of people and Asia doesn't really add anything new. Both are much less common online.
1910 definitely should have been.
There's definitely skill involved and it is fun, but it's not a train game. It's a 'join the dots' game with a train theme.
If you like boardgames and might have bought this one, it'll save you a small pile of money as it makes getting the physical game unnecessary.
To answer the OPs question: get Europe as well as 1910 from the DLCs. Europe provides a whole new map and some gameplay extensions while 1910 improves the vanilla game a lot. If you like these enough you might expand to Asia and Switzerland as well.
Big Cities would be last on my list. It makes games rather long and more difficult, there will be a lot more competetion involved, but it can get rather frustrating as well.
I just got the vanilla since it was on sale, and frankly, it looks to be a boring game....digitizing board games is kind of pointless, in some cases, they loose thir charm.
Also, if you play against multiple computer (or possibly human players; I can't remember as I never play people too often) the number also has a bearing on mechanics of play. If for example, you play Switzerland with 5 players instead of 3, you can come to a city where only so many entrance/exit points can leave from it. That is, if there are five points of connection and four have been used by your opponents, you're out of luck on using that fifth connection. Just another dynamic to play with.
But you are correct with the other maps: the number of players determines whether multiple routes between 2 cities can be used. With 2-3 players, only one route can be used. With 4-5 players, multiple routes can be used.
The game is great in digital format because it gives you more opponents and you do not have to schedule play time with friends. The basic strategy is the same, and the simplicity of the game is where the challenge comes in. There is a lot of subtle strategy to it that may not be as obvious until you play through against very good opponents.