Possible bug, or me being an idiot?

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

I was doing Strike Tutorial 3 Complex Strike, and i followed the instructions setting up all the targets as suggested. The first 2 strike missions went off fine, but the rest all had there IP auto set to be way to far from the target, and when they reached it they turned back to base and didn't attack? Is this a setting I've gotten wrong?

[Kadota]

It's a bug, I had the same problem that frustrated me for hours. After a crash, I think I'll put this on the shelf for a while.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Kadota:

It's a bug, I had the same problem that frustrated me for hours. After a crash, I think I'll put this on the shelf for a while.

Thanks, good to know its not me though! I'll stick to sub and surface naval stuff then, hopefully it gets fixed soon!

[JTHM]

Originally posted by Kadota:

It's a bug, I had the same problem that frustrated me for hours. After a crash, I think I'll put this on the shelf for a while.

Yeah, I've gone back to CMANO for now - there are just way too many bugs in the logic. It will be great once they iron them out. (and get Fog of War working in TacView)

[Gerd]

Disappointing, thanks for the heads up

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Gerd:

Disappointing, thanks for the heads up

It seems like a really big bug, not sure how it didn't get noticed before release tbh.

[Surveyor]

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

Originally posted by Gerd:

Disappointing, thanks for the heads up

It seems like a really big bug, not sure how it didn't get noticed before release tbh.

You mean you don't have any problems with the AAW side of things? Like opposing sides aircraft completely ignoring each other most of the time.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Surveyor:

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

It seems like a really big bug, not sure how it didn't get noticed before release tbh.

You mean you don't have any problems with the AAW side of things? Like opposing sides aircraft completely ignoring each other most of the time.

I mainly do naval scenarios with very little air, so not yet.

[Surveyor]

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

Originally posted by Surveyor:

You mean you don't have any problems with the AAW side of things? Like opposing sides aircraft completely ignoring each other most of the time.

I mainly do naval scenarios with very little air, so not yet.

Can you please at least check a little AA? Just hit a quick battle with two groups of aircraft, preferably non-stealth and see if you can get them to attack each other without ordering that directly. Also see if the enemy is going to attack you at all.
In my case I think I got attacked once, but never again since then. And my aircraft seem to attack only when I order them to.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Surveyor:

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

I mainly do naval scenarios with very little air, so not yet.

Can you please at least check a little AA? Just hit a quick battle with two groups of aircraft, preferably non-stealth and see if you can get them to attack each other without ordering that directly. Also see if the enemy is going to attack you at all.
In my case I think I got attacked once, but never again since then. And my aircraft seem to attack only when I order them to.

I've seen other posts so I imagine its a bug, hopefully the devs fix most of them soon

[Surveyor]

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

Originally posted by Surveyor:

Can you please at least check a little AA? Just hit a quick battle with two groups of aircraft, preferably non-stealth and see if you can get them to attack each other without ordering that directly. Also see if the enemy is going to attack you at all.
In my case I think I got attacked once, but never again since then. And my aircraft seem to attack only when I order them to.

I've seen other posts so I imagine its a bug, hopefully the devs fix most of them soon

I hope they do. It's actually funny that I'm not playing CMO because of the air to air situation, since it's indeed mostly a naval warfare sim, but lately aviation started mattering to me, so I will stick with CMANO until the patches are out.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Surveyor:

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

I've seen other posts so I imagine its a bug, hopefully the devs fix most of them soon

I hope they do. It's actually funny that I'm not playing CMO because of the air to air situation, since it's indeed mostly a naval warfare sim, but lately aviation started mattering to me, so I will stick with CMANO until the patches are out.

Yh, i've actually given it a negative review (may even be my first negative review) for now as im a little disappointed with the kinds of bugs I have had and others have had. Them along with the typos and references to CMANO in the tutorial briefings makes me wonder how much testing they actually did? Bugs on release is one thing, but these are major bugs that surely would of come up in testing. Its still a great game, and when its fixed will be amazing. Would be nice if the devs posted about all the bugs to say they are working on them though.

[Dimitris]

On the matter of AAW engagements: Can you please give this test build a try: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4718291&mpage=1

[Surveyor]

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

Originally posted by Surveyor:

I hope they do. It's actually funny that I'm not playing CMO because of the air to air situation, since it's indeed mostly a naval warfare sim, but lately aviation started mattering to me, so I will stick with CMANO until the patches are out.

Yh, i've actually given it a negative review (may even be my first negative review) for now as im a little disappointed with the kinds of bugs I have had and others have had. Them along with the typos and references to CMANO in the tutorial briefings makes me wonder how much testing they actually did? Bugs on release is one thing, but these are major bugs that surely would of come up in testing. Its still a great game, and when its fixed will be amazing. Would be nice if the devs posted about all the bugs to say they are working on them though.

I think this could benefit from Early Access more than the most titles, since it looks like they didn't really have a lot of testers to begin with. For example, it becomes pretty apparent nobody tried to run this on a 1440p monitor...
Anyhow, at least it looks like they have started ironing out some of the bugs... Check this thread (at the bottom): https://steamcommunity.com/app/1076160/discussions/0/3356799628305957939/
I was itching to give this a negative review too, but I think I'll wait a while. I think if they'll fix most of the bugs as quickly, at least that is commendable.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Sure, I'll give it a test.

[欣怡 (Nathalie)]

Originally posted by Surveyor:

Originally posted by OBESE MONKEYY(肥胖猴子):

Yh, i've actually given it a negative review (may even be my first negative review) for now as im a little disappointed with the kinds of bugs I have had and others have had. Them along with the typos and references to CMANO in the tutorial briefings makes me wonder how much testing they actually did? Bugs on release is one thing, but these are major bugs that surely would of come up in testing. Its still a great game, and when its fixed will be amazing. Would be nice if the devs posted about all the bugs to say they are working on them though.

I think this could benefit from Early Access more than the most titles, since it looks like they didn't really have a lot of testers to begin with. For example, it becomes pretty apparent nobody tried to run this on a 1440p monitor...
Anyhow, at least it looks like they have started ironing out some of the bugs... Check this thread (at the bottom): https://steamcommunity.com/app/1076160/discussions/0/3356799628305957939/
I was itching to give this a negative review too, but I think I'll wait a while. I think if they'll fix most of the bugs as quickly, at least that is commendable.

Oh yh, I mean the review will almost certainly be changed to positive soon, I just wanted people to know they might wanna wait a little.