What do you want to see in Panzer Corp 3?

[oneinsaneride]

- Better performance
- More in depth campaign. (maybe a little more like total war)

[njpool]

Multiplayer campaign would be my chief request!

[Tal'Raziid]

I don't want to see a Panzer Corps 3. I'd like to see a similar game by the devs that isn't Yermany

[cssneed]

引用自 RobOda：

Nothing.

They have too much to do with PZC2 at the moment.

They need to do the Pacific War from both the Allied and Japanese perspectives.

The AO 1945 and beyond (Historical and A-historical)

The AO West.

The AO Africa

And finally an Allied Campaign, where they can take advantage of the new Special Ops feature and shared units, to start with a potential Poland battle or two instead of just skipping to the 1940's African Campaign. (I genuinely would love a long Allied campaign from '39 through to 45 focusing on Europe and Africa tbh.)

Edit: And I hadn't even included a Russian campaign, like the old Soviet Corps ~ but bigger and better hopefully, with a year to year campaign like AO seeing how they were involved in Asia and Finland in the early years.

I 100% concur!!!!!

[Flankdust]

I'd like to see a much greater investment in variable campaign paths based on scenario results, with a series of solid victories reproducing the historical course of events, while a series of outstanding victories or marginal victories alter the "history" significantly. And related to that, an order of magnitude of improvement in user made scenario and campaign tools--especially for building campaigns with "in scenario" variables determining the next scenario loaded in the campaign.

Another option is an expansion of scope with separate Armies pursuing campaigns in different regions but results in one region affecting conditions in another--possibly as far as having the results of entirely naval/air scenario in May affecting supply or the number of elite replacements available to you (or your opponent) in August elsewhere.

Development of a grand strategy PzC III game which allows the player to define their overall approach to the war which can vary greatly from history. The resolution mechanism would still be PzC scenarios with conditions dictated by prior scenarios and the "global strategy" chosen by the player. Of course it would be great if you could take any nation in the conflict and have appropriate scenarios generated given your choices. Postpone Barbarossa until after the British are dealt with? Pz C III can deal with it. Push on and force the B.E.F. to surrender at Dunkirk? Pz C III has it covered.

Allow a General to spend excess prestige to nudge the direction of the arms industry toward customized production...the player can make design choices for off menu prototypes and test them out (with an appropriate reliability risk)...And once the unit has 1000 experience, for an even greater prestige price, you can get your units listed as standard equipment.

[Evil Carlonis]

People's General....

[Hydro]

Would like to see pacific cause it sure as hell ain't happening in panzercorps 2

[Tal'Raziid]

引用自 Hydro：

Would like to see pacific cause it sure as hell ain't happening in panzercorps 2

I mean, there's a page for it already. Waiting for it to ACTUALLY COME OUT, though

[Boredflak]

引用自 Tal'Raziid：

引用自 Hydro：

Would like to see pacific cause it sure as hell ain't happening in panzercorps 2

I mean, there's a page for it already. Waiting for it to ACTUALLY COME OUT, though

It was shelved on the 18th of January. No post here about it until someone posted about it and Edmon confirmed it was not going forward. And yeah the page with coming soon is still there.

[Tal'Raziid]

引用自 Boredflak：

引用自 Tal'Raziid：

I mean, there's a page for it already. Waiting for it to ACTUALLY COME OUT, though

It was shelved on the 18th of January. No post here about it until someone posted about it and Edmon confirmed it was not going forward. And yeah the page with coming soon is still there.

Oh ♥♥♥♥, was it? I missed that, that ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sucks.
Honestly, I enjoyed the first game but was quite frankly disappointed when this game was ALSO about the same nation, in the same conflict

[Commander]

I want to see more random map settings (Location, Season, AI Settings) and gametypes like random mini Campaigns (Free for all, next is defend, next is attack - and so on)

Northgard is doing pretty well when it comes
to gamemodes for singleplayer.

Also maybe for players who love the art design of the game - more unit scale options (smaller but more units on one field)

The Limited Stock feature is pretty good - but maybe more sliders for infantry, tanks, planes.
Also the setting to get stock every turn (+1 Unit per turn, +2 units per Turn) and the possibility to get more of a type by adding some (Tank General +4 Tank Stock every turn)

So far i love the game and also the editor.

[steves490]

Would love an optional scenario or campaign to be one big Europe map. With units on the map representing armies/divisions instead of individual units.

[McDonis]

Prob something only I want but I organize my units into battle groups \ divisions and I would love more ways to build out groups of units I can quickly move and organize in the UI menu. I hate that there are no ways to change sorts of units or to add layers like hisitorical divison unit patch ect.

[easylife]

Maybe a Panzer Corps 1.5 (Grand Campaign) with less graphic and power consumption. So it can be played on tablets, Steamdeck etc.

[jman0war]

It's too early for a Panzer Corps 3!
There's still a lot of road for Panzer Corps 2.

But I could see the game engine recycled and repurposed for new games with interesting settings.

Cold War was already mentioned, that could be neat.
American Civil War might be a nice campaign in a historical setting, with alternate non-historical paths.
Napoleonic Wars maybe.

[easylife]

Or an ancient setting with Cataphract instead of Panzers, Archers instead of Firearms, Elephants instead of Landkreuzers and Catapults like Onager as heavy Artillery.
Just don't make the mistake and go too far in history. Total War Pharaoh made the mistake to go to the Copper and Bronze Age, which were not as popular to the players as the Roman Empire period.