Game cheats with Rain & Suicide Units

[Hellenic Born]

Well haters gonna hate and fanboys like anything.

Now this one of the worst cheating games i played.

1. It rains always than when the KI needs to be saved from Planes and a) to extend on more more round mostly the last 3 rounds b) it rains only for the player.

2. Tanks can climb up the top of everest if its needed. Devs need to explain how tanks can climb.

3. A noob KI infantery kils 8 points of a 3 star tank in the open field. I bet thats a captain america unit.

4. Enclosed units with no ammo and fuel left make in the next round that one step needed to reach the arty and inflict heavy looses even if said unit has only 1 point left.

5. Supression doesnt work as it is said because you can bomb a unit till eternity his ammo/fuel doesnt go to 0. It SHOULD go to 0 according to the manual.

6. A 1 point enclosed unit does not die while beiing hit by 5 tanks (round 20) so just u dont win the round. Same experience.

7. Suicide units. Ally tank/infantery unit suicide or moves himself to be enclosed and to suicide just to a) reach your arty or b) to slow you down, esspecialy at the end of the scenario. Devs need to show us what suicide units the Allies had, that being tank, planes or regular infantery. I remember the japanese had suicide units.

8.KI always knows where player units are, esspecialy the arty, without any ki units nearby planes go straight to the arty (here u can setup nice ambushes). IF the KI didnt know where the arty is, it wouldnt fly into that plane ambush, that is over the arty.

Well im geting bored else i could write some more.
Games in general are getting worse and worse, they only want money but they dont deliver. Money for unfinished games and dlcs.


If you paint a pice of wood as a bananna and want to sell it as a bananna it still is a pice of wood and not a bananna.

Lastly if you find grammar mistake keep them, english isnt my mothertongue and i dont regard it as importand as other languages.

Lets the flaming begin! Serious arguments i do answer and i accept and apologise if you prove me wrong.

Bonus: A polish horse unit kills or destruct heavy a german armormed tank unit. Look up on google/wiki the polish conquest and battles between german tanks and polish horse units. They got slaughtered with NO looses.

[Green Knight]

Originally posted by EUSSR:

Originally posted by E.C.Tetrapack:

Each Polish Cavalry Brigade was equipped with 50-60 AT rifles and 12-18 37mm AT guns. Cavarly units in WW2 were basically normal infrantry, just using horses instead of trucks as means of transport.

But they charge ingame

The Polish Army did not fight German tanks with horse-mounted cavalry wielding lances and swords. In 1939, only 10% of the Polish army was made up of cavalry units.[127] Polish cavalry never charged German tanks or entrenched infantry or artillery, but usually acted as mobile infantry (like dragoons) and reconnaissance units, and executed cavalry charges only in rare situations against foot soldiers.
,
Panzer III and Panzer IV were more heavily armored and the Wz. 35 was less effective against these models.[2] At up to 400 meters it could penetrate all lightly armored vehicles. It could penetrate 15 mm of armor, sloped at 30° at 300 m distance, or 33 mm of armor at 100 m.[3]

Bofors 37 mm anti-tank gun
As the armor of tanks was increased during World War II the gun very quickly became obsolete as an anti-tank gun but was still used effectively as an infantry support gun for the entirety of the war, and well into the Cold War.


So, nope a horse unit wont kill a 8 point of a tank unit. It will hide if it see tanks.
You see the weapons they had are crap, there is a raison why germany wiped them out and conquered poland within days.

The cavalry CHARGES tanks in game?

What are you smoking?

The cavalry attacks at range 0, like other non artillery units, which is abstracted. At no point are lances and swords mentioned.

Edit : You think these are medieval knights. That's hilarious. WW2 cavalry is mounted infantry. No more, no less. Highly valued even well into the war on the Eastern Front because of its mobility.

[Black_Hole]

That´s said, close this nonsense Thread. This game should get improved in some ways, true. But the spoken points are noting but ridiculous.

[Hellenic Born]

Originally posted by !Alien!:

That´s said, close this nonsense Thread. This game should get improved in some ways, true. But the spoken points are noting but ridiculous.

Who decide if its ridiculus. You have nothing to say against but rule it ridiulus, you must be very yung fellow. cheers

[[E.C.]Tetrapack]

Originally posted by EUSSR:

You see the weapons they had are crap, there is a raison why germany wiped them out and conquered poland within days.

Germany lost 236 tanks in the 35 days it took to conquer Poland.

Why don't you quote the whole section of the Wikipedia article about the Wz.35?
"The effective range was 300 metres and the weapon was effective against the most numerous German tanks of the period (the Panzer I and II). Panzer III and Panzer IV were more heavily armored and the Wz. 35 was less effective against these models."

The same for the Wikipedia article about the 37mm Bofors AT gun:
"At that time, the armored forces of the Wehrmacht consisted mainly of light Panzer I and Panzer II tanks, which were vulnerable to the Bofors gun. Early models of the Panzer III and Panzer IV could also be penetrated at ranges up to 500 m."

You don't even get Panzer III or IV in the Poland scenarios in PC2.

[eddieballgame]

PzC2 is addictive, fun, & requires much thought to generate successful results.
For me, the experience of playing this...gem has been enhanced via the aid of YouTubers 'Green Knight', 'TheEdmon' & 'TheHistoricalGamer' to name 3.
A close friend of mine, who is a PzC1 expert (imho) gives this game high marks.
PzC2 may not reach the community numbers per players as PzC1, but it certainly has the potential to surpass it.

[Hellenic Born]

Originally posted by eddieballgame:

PzC2 is addictive, fun, & requires much thought to generate successful results.
For me, the experience of playing this...gem has been enhanced via the aid of YouTubers 'Green Knight', 'TheEdmon' & 'TheHistoricalGamer' to name 3.
A close friend of mine, who is a PzC1 expert (imho) gives this game high marks.
PzC2 may not reach the community numbers per players as PzC1, but it certainly has the potential to surpass it.

That can all be true what you say but what i posted still stands.

[Green Knight]

Originally posted by EUSSR:

Originally posted by eddieballgame:

PzC2 is addictive, fun, & requires much thought to generate successful results.
For me, the experience of playing this...gem has been enhanced via the aid of YouTubers 'Green Knight', 'TheEdmon' & 'TheHistoricalGamer' to name 3.
A close friend of mine, who is a PzC1 expert (imho) gives this game high marks.
PzC2 may not reach the community numbers per players as PzC1, but it certainly has the potential to surpass it.

That can all be true what you say but what i posted still stands.

What you posted is still a heap of nonsense. Liking the game is irrelevant in that regard. You've just fundamentally misunderstood everything there is to misunderstand.

[Hellenic Born]

Originally posted by E.C.Tetrapack:

Originally posted by EUSSR:

You see the weapons they had are crap, there is a raison why germany wiped them out and conquered poland within days.

Germany lost 236 tanks in the 35 days it took to conquer Poland.

Why don't you quote the whole section of the Wikipedia article about the Wz.35?
"The effective range was 300 metres and the weapon was effective against the most numerous German tanks of the period (the Panzer I and II). Panzer III and Panzer IV were more heavily armored and the Wz. 35 was less effective against these models."

The same for the Wikipedia article about the 37mm Bofors AT gun:
"At that time, the armored forces of the Wehrmacht consisted mainly of light Panzer I and Panzer II tanks, which were vulnerable to the Bofors gun. Early models of the Panzer III and Panzer IV could also be penetrated at ranges up to 500 m."

You don't even get Panzer III or IV in the Poland scenarios in PC2.

236 out of how many? You understand that it was a total war invation? You present it as if the horsewarriors with their junky weapons anihilated the german tank. Where in fact they DID RUN AWAY from the tanks. Now i made some more points valid in this threads about the game is cheating. About the cheting ou have nothing to say than hey the polish anihilated with horses the german tanks in the open field, therefor ingame a orseunit can anihilate a tankunit in the open field. Now that is hillarious. Try to understand what you read in wikipedia.

Originally posted by Green Knight:

Originally posted by EUSSR:

That can all be true what you say but what i posted still stands.

What you posted is still a heap of nonsense. Liking the game is irrelevant in that regard. You've just fundamentally misunderstood everything there is to misunderstand.

No i didnt, i made some facts clear.

Lets see cheating
A horse unit equipted with nukebombs attacks a damaged tank unit (8 points) in the open field and leaves it with 1 point health. Next round rain is coming because the only unit that can reach the nukebombing captain america horse warrior unit that can kill an entire german tank army, as they did in poland 1939, is a plane. It rains so the ki unit survives 1 more round to nuke your , how did a fellow in here say, "fragile" tank.

Or

you need the planes to bomb that norwegian unit in the city so your pioneers can take less looses and take the city to finish the scenario. round 18 rain, round 19 rain, round 20 rain. Meanwhile on the other front at the other city KI planes attack your force in round 18 no rainfor KI, round 19 no rain for KI, round 20 no rain for KI.


And you want to tell me that, this is no cheating. LOL

[Ichthyic]

"Who decide if its ridiculus."

consensus.

and learn to fkn spell.

[Hellenic Born]

Originally posted by Ichthyic:

"Who decide if its ridiculus."

consensus.

and learn to fkn spell.

you arenot concensus you are just a troll, and no english is unimportand to learnto spell.

[Ichthyic]

go back to sleep.

[Green Knight]

Originally posted by EUSSR:

Originally posted by E.C.Tetrapack:

Germany lost 236 tanks in the 35 days it took to conquer Poland.

Why don't you quote the whole section of the Wikipedia article about the Wz.35?
"The effective range was 300 metres and the weapon was effective against the most numerous German tanks of the period (the Panzer I and II). Panzer III and Panzer IV were more heavily armored and the Wz. 35 was less effective against these models."

The same for the Wikipedia article about the 37mm Bofors AT gun:
"At that time, the armored forces of the Wehrmacht consisted mainly of light Panzer I and Panzer II tanks, which were vulnerable to the Bofors gun. Early models of the Panzer III and Panzer IV could also be penetrated at ranges up to 500 m."

You don't even get Panzer III or IV in the Poland scenarios in PC2.

236 out of how many? You understand that it was a total war invation? You present it as if the horsewarriors with their junky weapons anihilated the german tank. Where in fact they DID RUN AWAY from the tanks. Now i made some more points valid in this threads about the game is cheating. About the cheting ou have nothing to say than hey the polish anihilated with horses the german tanks in the open field, therefor ingame a orseunit can anihilate a tankunit in the open field. Now that is hillarious. Try to understand what you read in wikipedia.

Originally posted by Green Knight:

What you posted is still a heap of nonsense. Liking the game is irrelevant in that regard. You've just fundamentally misunderstood everything there is to misunderstand.

No i didnt, i made some facts clear.

Lets see cheating
A horse unit equipted with nukebombs attacks a damaged tank unit (8 points) in the open field and leaves it with 1 point health. Next round rain is coming because the only unit that can reach the nukebombing captain america horse warrior unit that can kill an entire german tank army, as they did in poland 1939, is a plane. It rains so the ki unit survives 1 more round to nuke your , how did a fellow in here say, "fragile" tank.

Or

you need the planes to bomb that norwegian unit in the city so your pioneers can take less looses and take the city to finish the scenario. round 18 rain, round 19 rain, round 20 rain. Meanwhile on the other front at the other city KI planes attack your force in round 18 no rainfor KI, round 19 no rain for KI, round 20 no rain for KI.


And you want to tell me that, this is no cheating. LOL

No, it's not cheating. It's called randomness.

If that's a problem for you, turn combat randomness to 0 and turn off the weather. You could even turn off the fog of war, so you can see everything. Maybe that makes you feel better?

And learn how to back up your units with support fire. Bc if you struggle with this in Poland... it gets worse, much worse :D

Btw: that cavalry you're talking about, came equipped with rifles, machine guns, grenades, AT rifles, light AT guns, the works.

The tanks you, as the German start with, are utter ♥♥♥♥♥. Pz I and Pz IIs. If anything, the game gives them way too much credit. The Pz II, in particular, with Rapid Fire x1.5 is way too god for its points. But also the PzIB has tremendous attack ratings (and rapid fire).

[Hellenic Born]

Originally posted by Ichthyic:

go back to sleep.

You know except of this cheating game, there is something called TMZ that, mostly regulate when people are sleeping or not. You ll figure it out some day.

Originally posted by Green Knight:

Originally posted by EUSSR:

236 out of how many? You understand that it was a total war invation? You present it as if the horsewarriors with their junky weapons anihilated the german tank. Where in fact they DID RUN AWAY from the tanks. Now i made some more points valid in this threads about the game is cheating. About the cheting ou have nothing to say than hey the polish anihilated with horses the german tanks in the open field, therefor ingame a orseunit can anihilate a tankunit in the open field. Now that is hillarious. Try to understand what you read in wikipedia.




No i didnt, i made some facts clear.

Lets see cheating
A horse unit equipted with nukebombs attacks a damaged tank unit (8 points) in the open field and leaves it with 1 point health. Next round rain is coming because the only unit that can reach the nukebombing captain america horse warrior unit that can kill an entire german tank army, as they did in poland 1939, is a plane. It rains so the ki unit survives 1 more round to nuke your , how did a fellow in here say, "fragile" tank.

Or

you need the planes to bomb that norwegian unit in the city so your pioneers can take less looses and take the city to finish the scenario. round 18 rain, round 19 rain, round 20 rain. Meanwhile on the other front at the other city KI planes attack your force in round 18 no rainfor KI, round 19 no rain for KI, round 20 no rain for KI.


And you want to tell me that, this is no cheating. LOL

No, it's not cheating. It's called randomness.

If that's a problem for you, turn combat randomness to 0 and turn off the weather. You could even turn off the fog of war, so you can see everything. Maybe that makes you feel better?

And learn how to back up your units with support fire. Bc if you struggle with this in Poland... it gets worse, much worse :D

Btw: that cavalry you're talking about, came equipped with rifles, machine guns, grenades, AT rifles, light AT guns, the works.

The tanks you, as the German start with, are utter ♥♥♥♥♥. Pz I and Pz IIs. If anything, the game gives them way too much credit. The Pz II, in particular, with Rapid Fire x1.5 is way too god for its points. But also the PzIB has tremendous attack ratings (and rapid fire).

i am bad in english but do you understand the word "obsolete" in regard to said weapons in ww2?

its not randomnes its cheating. if all bad for me and not bad for ki thats cheating not randomnes. A random weather would count for me and for the ki in SAME round, that would be randomnes. I know what an rng is, but this one is scripted. So devs cheating to sell a bananna that is a painted wood.

I didnt say i struggled in poland i said the game cheat, same way in africa tanks go up to top of a mountain to retreat and in next turn to come down behind you. cheating not a bananna. You know what i mean.

[Green Knight]

Yes, yes. You say the game cheats, but it doesn't. Also, you misunderstand how most of the game works it seems. I suggest playing more, git god, and then maybe you won't have the irrational feeling the AI "cheats."

[Path]

It's hard to take any of your salty drivel seriously when it really all comes down to "the AI cheats." No, your inability to understand game mechanics does not mean that the AI cheats. There are a number of bugs and poorly documented features, but these affect the player as much as they affect the AI.