Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
America at 1922 from 1890 start is certainly the most successful. Sure, its beginner mode, but from what I can tell so far, the beginner mode allows you to choose going to war or not, when you choose to.
Like you, I havent experienced too many issues with the game thus far. I know reasonably well how the battle system works for the autosolver and the times in the battle mode for me have always worked. Sure there's nitpicks and quirks that I dont like, but those quirks settle down after a minute or so and it smooths out... The boat bouncing issue for example at the start of a battle is annoying but not game breaking.
As I mentioned earlier, I've gone through 30 years in the game and it feels like I've gone through more what with everything happening for the past 12 game years. Had the largest fleet in the world [and still do, even after trimming the old units after the last war]. Economy is still growing, research might still be stuck at "behind" even though my tech research is at 99% for the past year. Again, not a showstopper for me.
I'm still learning the game, even after a number of years of playing it, and if I'm reading your thoughts correctly, you too are also just posting your thoughts on the game while enjoying it. I appreciate posts like this, wish we had more genuine posts of appreciation rather then "X/Y is wrong, help/fix it" type of posts. I'm glad to contribute to your observation thread
If anything approaching a question is needed however, It would be how you dealt with the research issue where for some reason, one gets stuck on "behind". As I have thought problem currently despite my research funding being at max for the last year or so.
No questions needed, but of course welcome.
As I mentioned in another thread regarding tech research, even in the older versions of the game, I cannot recall ever falling farther than either "Behind" and "Below Average" for extended periods of time when playing on Normal Difficulty. By that, I mean any longer than perhaps a year, maybe slightly longer. I cannot speak for any difficulty levels above Normal.
Personally, I've never concerned myself with being overly worried about what the technology rating on the World Screen says...I know it will eventually correct itself. Even in those campaigns where my technology would fluctuate between Average and Behind, by the time my GDP grew to the point where I could keep the tech slider at 90% or above (1920 or so), my tech would quickly rise to Above Average or Advanced. At least it always has for me.
Thanks for the input...
Everyone seems to still be at 'average' tech (1898). Research is plodding along, but watching the 'log' nobody else seems to be coming up with super tech. I do use the research priorities to hurry specific things along- usually engines, small guns or torpedoes.
Diplomacy is a bit dicey but nothing unusual, lots of 'admiral x of country y provokes things', very little success in trying to improve relations. Stuff is going south with France and Russia, but that's to be expected. Trying to provoke a war with Russia, we'll see where that goes.