Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There is a problem right now where if you're losing on land, you don't want the war to end till you retake back the regions you lost, but if you keep beating them at sea, they'll eventually force you to sign peace treaty and you lose all the regions they currently occupy. This could lead to situations where two countries occupy the majority of each other's core territories when the war ends, basically switching places on the map, just makes the campaign very unrealistic.
How could they fix it? Maybe introduce Army budget? and give player option to allocate funds between Navy and Army?? so if you take too much money to Navy, Army gets weak??
Or something in these lines...
+1. This is definitely a good idea since it also enables more realistic dev decisions concerning the different national economies.
In general, the land war concept is a good one (after it'll be properly balanced) since it seems very unrealistic loosing core territories resulting from naval warfare only.
Imho another solution'd be to only stick to naval war and only allow annexions on the world map outside core territories as long as colonies are concerned and this only as a last resort instead of e.g. handing over fleet units.
Yeah, colonial wars only would be a good option as well.. maybe they should make it as settings option at the start of the campaign?
I like the budget thing, but I would also propose adding occupied provinces to the negotiating table. Basically whatever I took, and whatever they took, would be available at a discount.
It might take a bunch of re-coding but it would be a neat way for the admiralty to fix the... let's say errings of the army.
And let's not bring realism to it, we want a war roughly every four years (and having 1890 France stomped by China was cathartic). What matters is the player doesn't get punished for things he doesn't control.
This isn't HoI 4, we're here to pewpew with luxurious tincans, not to repaint the map per se. A lost home province to me, long as it's not my fault, is just an excuse for more war, and that's engagement/immersion.