Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Get a hobby.
100 % agree, last thing that any game need are feminist spreading propaganda.
If I produce a product it`s up to me as owner to what it will contain, not customer and i didn`t see any "100 % historical acurate" futture of this product.
The game isn't really a Historical RPG. In many ways it's more of a rogue 'lite' than an actual recounting of history. It does have many historical elements but I believe a lot of that is mostly for visual dressing. If anything it's a little anachronistic covering a period as far as the mid 1860s to the late 1890's.
The focus of the game isn't the historical elements. It's simply a game with its own system meant to entertain on its own. You'll soon find many of those systems are 'gamey' and not really a reflection of anything that would have occured in real life.
I'm disappointed there won't be a female character. Much less interested in the game now, honestly.
Do you want an honest answer?
+1
We care. it's supposed to be a portrait of historical accuracy to an extent, you're supposed to have women in camps, their's also female cowgirls, point is, WOMEN WAS THERE AND IN CAMPS, and their children, women and men got slaughtered, not just men, also women reproduced to add to the camp.
Personally I would also love to see native women in camps over a certain size because they would have been there taking care of their men and camp. There were a few who lead or participated on raids but they were a critical part of tribal and warfare dynamics. They were the near essential support role without which the warriors could not wage their resistance. To completely omit them, just feels lacking.
So when people do 'not' want playable female characters, they are sexist/misogynists.
Yet, when they 'do' want playable female characters, they just want boob physics?
Okay then. XD
Not what I, I, was saying at all. Which if you had looked at my other comments in the thread at all you would have known but may have and just not given a dump about because it did not fit the narrative you are trying to push. Female or male playable chief, cool either way and understandable to not have considering it is made by 4 people. Complete lack of females in the game at all, disappointing. Heck, we can't even alter the look of our character/chief.
Just be a male warrior and enjoy it. Nobody cried when Tomb Raider was the only halfway open world game for years and years and was female, or when GTA only offered a black character. Just play.
I really, really wish they would add women and children accurately, that is the one big handicap that made it so much more difficult for the native bands fighting the government, they had to protect their women, children and domestic needs at all times, they were vulnerable at all times.And there were no boobs showing, native women dressed very conservatively, they covered nearly everything all the time. You know nothing Jon Snow, nothing at all.
The women among the Lakota, Cheyenne and Arapaho did the mutilations that happened after big raids or battles, they came up after the enemy was all dead or driven away and cut off genitals and other things like that. You know nothing.