This "sim" will never gets to the AMS1 level

[Foutre Béliqueux]

No offense but this sim will never gets to the AMS1 level.
Why, you may ask ?
Because the Engine is from a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up game. It's wanky, it's not even good looking for 2020.
Just give AMS1 a try again and you will be mindblowed by the game.
There's still so much to achieve with the first, but sadly money is money, better sell a fake sim, calling it "Early Access Still in Dev". We're not in 2015 Reiza, EA and Backing Projects are not hyped anymore and I hope you don't kill your company by commiting to this ♥♥♥♥ engine and a 100$ DLC policy already out on AMS1.

[Blahde]

To be honest I can kinda see what the guy means. It's using SMS PC2 engine and the A.I. in that game is just terrible, maybe the worst in recent years.

If you are a MP guy then that won't bother you too much but for folks that don't MP much it's a HUGE issue. I would have bought this already if it hadn't associated itself with Simply (F*****g) Mad Studios.
Trust is gone.

[Marius]

I don't know what you're talking, but the AI up to standards. They behave similar like AMS 1 AI, which are one of the best, and perhaps the best in Simracingworld. Only needs some finetuning here and there.

I know it's using the Madness Engine, but its not pCars 1 or 2. It's like having a hammer. A hammer is not per se bad. It's the person using the hammer.

[Marsi]

LokiD1978 a écrit :

this topic is why you dont read steam discussions.

Sooo true...but here we are....;-)

[BreadedVirus]

Marius a écrit :

I don't know what you're talking, but the AI up to standards. They behave similar like AMS 1 AI, which are one of the best, and perhaps the best in Simracingworld. Only needs some finetuning here and there.

I know it's using the Madness Engine, but its not pCars 1 or 2. It's like having a hammer. A hammer is not per se bad. It's the person using the hammer.

As soon as i fired up the game, the first thing that i said to myself was "this looks too much like PC2"

I enjoyed the brief time i had with the game, but the content is not what i was hoping for. The only content i enjoyed were the F1 cars. Also very shocked that the game came with such a terrible selection of race tracks. Monza, Silverstone, Laguna Seca to name a few should have been included.

This is just my opinion, so nobody needs to have a heart attack over it.....

I will probably pick the game up at a later date when more (better) content is available.

[Marius]

BreadedVirus a écrit :

Marius a écrit :

I don't know what you're talking, but the AI up to standards. They behave similar like AMS 1 AI, which are one of the best, and perhaps the best in Simracingworld. Only needs some finetuning here and there.

I know it's using the Madness Engine, but its not pCars 1 or 2. It's like having a hammer. A hammer is not per se bad. It's the person using the hammer.

As soon as i fired up the game, the first thing that i said to myself was "this looks too much like PC2"

I enjoyed the brief time i had with the game, but the content is not what i was hoping for. The only content i enjoyed were the F1 cars. Also very shocked that the game came with such a terrible selection of race tracks. Monza, Silverstone, Laguna Seca to name a few should have been included.

This is just my opinion, so nobody needs to have a heart attack over it.....

I will probably pick the game up at a later date when more (better) content is available.

Try the tracks in Brazil. They are amazing. Very underrated. They have lots of flow. Good door-2-door battles and such.

[Roger Longkoch]

BreadedVirus a écrit :

Marius a écrit :

I don't know what you're talking, but the AI up to standards. They behave similar like AMS 1 AI, which are one of the best, and perhaps the best in Simracingworld. Only needs some finetuning here and there.

I know it's using the Madness Engine, but its not pCars 1 or 2. It's like having a hammer. A hammer is not per se bad. It's the person using the hammer.

As soon as i fired up the game, the first thing that i said to myself was "this looks too much like PC2"

I enjoyed the brief time i had with the game, but the content is not what i was hoping for. The only content i enjoyed were the F1 cars. Also very shocked that the game came with such a terrible selection of race tracks. Monza, Silverstone, Laguna Seca to name a few should have been included.

This is just my opinion, so nobody needs to have a heart attack over it.....

I will probably pick the game up at a later date when more (better) content is available.

You seem to be expecting a full level of content from a title that is going to offer DLC, which is unreasonable. Of course it looks like PC2, it uses the same engine.

[Jackrabbit_V6/ RSProduxx]

spaceje a écrit :

No offense but this sim will never gets to the AMS1 level.

your crystal ball is broken.. my tarot said the opposite :)

[htvboxaust]

I agreed , AMS2 is simply an arcade style kids racing game . Simply no fun at all racing with AI. Have a good race with AI and you find they simply glued to the track. You can hardly make them spin out. What dumb AI physics I can say. They worked on the player's physics and simply forgotten about the AI physics/crash model. I'm 99% guarantee when the full release comes out it will be the same.

Take for example the player's car physics. When you spin out at high speed the car reacted so unrealistic. It does n't slide sideways as much, instead the car simply spin round and round. Even RF2 feels more realistic . Every inch of the physics feels way much realistic compared to AMS2. So many positive thoughts before the beta release and now a huge disappointment. REIZA , sorry you are failing.

[Baker]

htvboxaust a écrit :

I agreed , AMS2 is simply an arcade style kids racing game . Simply no fun at all racing with AI. Have a good race with AI and you find they simply glued to the track. You can hardly make them spin out. What dumb AI physics I can say. They worked on the player's physics and simply forgotten about the AI physics/crash model. I'm 99% guarantee when the full release comes out it will be the same.

Take for example the player's car physics. When you spin out at high speed the car reacted so unrealistic. It does n't slide sideways as much, instead the car simply spin round and round. Even RF2 feels more realistic . Every inch of the physics feels way much realistic compared to AMS2. So many positive thoughts before the beta release and now a huge disappointment. REIZA , sorry you are failing.

yeah I dont know about that.
I trust them to fix the AI but I cant imagine its their first priority at the present time.
As it is now it is already better that Pcars2 from what iv seen. It just needs some more tweeting.
I have full confidence they can pull it off. These guys will make the best of the engine.
A game engine does not make the game it needs good input to get good output and I trust Reiza will do a good job with it .

[4speed318]

complaining about what is wrong with an early access title makes no sense at all
point out what is good, point out what needs work
THEN WAIT

[pennarguy]

;2137462524952810373 a écrit :

MasterLooser a écrit :

he does not, the little mouse icon next to the name in the post shows if someone has a game, if theres no mouse == no game

tho looking at his history he played 1.8h and then refunded

LOL what a d*#k how can you make an informed opinion in 1.8h i am still working on the ffb setup after 5 h

Not a good advert for the game then...5 hours and you are still working on the ffb. AMS1 took no where near that long.
My confusion with AMS2 is the UI, (part imperial and part metric), the UI in AMS1 was a breeze, it would be great if there was a choice between the AMS1 UI and the present AMS 2 UI.
Can only wish...are you reading this dev's.

[MaDoNiOn]

spaceje a écrit :

Baker a écrit :

VR is not so good in AMS1.
Really I think a lot of VR users will end up getting this because it is smooth and nice in VR

VR is like 2% of the users dude...

i race only in VR, quickly changed from flat screen and the game runs and looks beautifull in VR! its so immersive. Also the FFB feels great as i can feel all the effects i need while in VR to keep the car going fast. it really is amazing and raceroom or assetto corsa don't give me all the ffb i want. as for the old games eh ams 1 menu instantly puts me off the game and graphics. no ffb wizardry will make me play that or rfactor 2 anymore.

[rwsampsell02]

do yall not understand that it is only a month into early access? Give it time

[commodore128]

I prefer Assetto Corsa engine, I know it's limited, but not as grainny as the projectcars 2 engine.

[NTU]

hyperseven a écrit :

spaceje a écrit :

98% of Sim Racers don't use VR.
Never seen any pro drivers or manufacturers use VR.
Long live Triple Screen.
VR is a marketing bait.

What a moron. Cant afford VR so goes off on one :)

Typical VR fanboy, insult someone who doesn't like it. You guys always jump to insults, the VR community is incredibly toxic to anyone outside their circle.