Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
And even the Tencent arguement...
You are concerned about your data? Your public profil tells more, than KRAFTON receives from JB. You have already lots of games from publisher where Tencent holds more than the 14% in KRAFTON.
Be straight and leave steam, or admit to yourself that you are hypocritical. You throw all your data already in the public.
What sort of PII do you even have on steam? And why?
https://dinkum.krafton.com/en/policy/terms_of_service
They have a class action waiver and claims against the company waiver.
You can no longer, by terms, share this game in Family share in Steam by their rules. They also follow the same thing Steam typically does where you do not own your game. You "license" ONE copy.
Why does this matter? This isnt an MMO. They are now telling you how to play. I guess people can no longer use the infinite dirt glitch or the remove dirt glitch. Even though it hurts no one. Cant use the item duping glitch anymore either because its... bad for... what? An invisible non-existent economy??
Again, this is mainly an offline game that isnt an MMO and doesnt have an economy so who cares how we play? It sounds like a lot of the current mods that people use for things like making the mines easier, having better automation, and NPC icons on the map are now against ToS.
I have to go through the Operating Policy and Privacy Policy next.
You outrage because you read something about personal data and someone tells Krafton = Tencent. If you really care about something like this, your steam library would be much smaller.
JB/Krafton is transparent what happen, that is their mistake. Noone cares all the other times when something like this happen, cause noone else gives you a message like this. But its always public informations. And in most cases its an investment takeover, not a dev/publisher collab.
How can I stop it when games get bought or passed around? You can't because there are no rules. Companies arnt honest who they are under making it a web of confusion, intentionally. I dont even have or use TikTok. Just because I happen to have or have previously game that was and or is now part of Tencent, doesnt mean I knew back then or the game might not have originally been under them.
Stop making excuses for companies to pass around data and information. We need protection. We should have rights.
Yes privat data is a serious thing, in this case it is not that hot you´re doing. Again, if you really concerned about that behavior, you shouldn´t be here on steam.
All your arguments here are also against steam and your game library. And guess what, i bet you would buy again a game here on steam. Or any other plattform with the same policies.
They dont define what "core mechanics of the game" are. There is no list from what I can see that defines what is and isnt permitted besides these few examples here.
Privacy Policy
There is a typo in here and they dont define what they mean by "third party". As someone who works with legal documents, you CANNOT "assume" a definition of a word and the definition in Webster does not always hold in court. Typically agreements have definition sections, I havnt found one yet.
They will be reading everything you type in game and probably be keeping your in game VC as well. If you play with friends and talk about random things you think might get you in violation such as politics or whatnot, I would advise no longer using in-game chat period. Even though they arnt hosting any servers and its all selfhosted.
Numbers 4 and 5 are pretty big.
Marketing activities? Are we going to get daily login events, battle passes, and leaderboards for WHAT?
Also they are analyzing our behaviour what??
They wont remove your data or stop processing it until after they get the data they want. So they get it any way. There is no actual opt out option period. They also keep your data and do who knows what with it later.
Friendly note if you live in CA.
EEA and UK friendly note.
All Hell Broke Lose I think.
It was nice what we had. The game, James Bendon slowly crafting it. I didn't care if I had to wait 6 months for the next update. Jame could take his time on it. We were in a nice cozy bubble.
Not anymore. A publisher I couldn't care less is stepping between me and my game ? Fair Dinkum, huh ?
No, it's not fair for us. We put our trust in James Bendon, and I feel somewhat betrayed, because we -the gamers- didn't had a word to say on this. We just have to accept it or just stop playing ?
Guess what : I'm stopping. I played this game since its very beginning, on the day it was made available on Steam. I have more than 600 hours of game, my town is finished, and I love it. Hell, I wanted to show that on my future Youtube channel. But not anymore. The fun is over.
Oh for those «This is the way it is for many games» I don't care. I had a blinded 100% trust toward James, this game was unique, the experience was unique. Now I have to deal with some obscure Korean company. I'm not okay with this and this is not okay.
What you read is 100% false.
"2) Scope of Permissible MODs
• Convenience Enhancement MODs: MODs that display item prices, enable automatic item collection, improve crafting convenience, and other features that do not compromise the core mechanics of the game are permitted."
The wording is so vague as to be useless. They can just decide a mod "compromises core mechanics" and then, what? Remove our ability to play the game? Even the fact they're trying to tell users what mods they can use is too far for me, I won't accept that.
And also: "exploit errors and bugs found while playing the Game, the Documentation or using the Services;"
So if we find a bug, then what? We *must* report it or be banned? I'm a beta tester for another game, I'm used to finding and reporting bugs, we often have fun with those bugs in private because they're funny and the devs are happy to see it as long as we report them first. Neither the devs nor me would ever expect random players to not exploit bugs they found upon pain of having their game revoked.