Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1034140/Subverse/
To claim a game is high quality and infer that the game is also good before it has even been released is both premature and wildly invalid. You don't know that the end result will be either high quality or even good. Recommend keeping an eye on it all you'd like, but you make it sound like it's a great game when it isn't even out yet.
A game's kickstarter footage is not proof of the final result. You can argue til you're purple in the face that Subverse is a quality game, but the fact of the matter is this: Subverse is not released and neither you nor anyone else knows what state it will be released in. Therefore, there is no evidence to support your claim that Subverse is good or high quality.
Until Subverse is released and can be interacted with, claims regarding its quality are nothing more than baseless speculation.
Depends on what games you're talking about..
Acting Lessons and Man of the House are both two pretty good sex games...
House Party was a decent enough game back when I played it.. seems they've added lots of new content, which likely means it's even better..
I haven't played Cyber City but it looks good.. the reviews are kind of scary, especially for a game which cost almost 15 dollars...