wtf this game have no players

[Trian]

a few server with 4 people on it, nope not for 30€

[M82]

Originally posted by Dante:

Agreed. It is heavily overpriced and lacks players. The game is early access and has yet to prove itself. Players aren't going to come at this rate if the devs don't adjust their expectations to face the reality of their asking price.

It's a shame. I really think this title looks great and has potential!

Well I'd love to join in on the fun but have you looked at these config requirements ? I'm not about to litteraly buy a new PC for a game that doesn't even look that great.

[flinkenberg]

Originally posted by Vantage:

Originally posted by Dante:

Agreed. It is heavily overpriced and lacks players. The game is early access and has yet to prove itself. Players aren't going to come at this rate if the devs don't adjust their expectations to face the reality of their asking price.

It's a shame. I really think this title looks great and has potential!

Well I'd love to join in on the fun but have you looked at these config requirements ? I'm not about to litteraly buy a new PC for a game that doesn't even look that great.

It's actually better optimized than Hell Let Loose to be honest. I play it on RX570 without any significant render quality adjustments with quite decent FPS.
I wish people played this more and I agree the price is not very welcoming although if it had people playing it it's well worth it I would say.

[GirthQuake]

I was gonna buy this game but for the price of the game with not as much content as I hoped strayed me away. I asked awhile ago when it first came out and all I got as responses was to buy the game and wait for updates or that the game is just a late boomer. No offense to those people but with the price and the current player count its not worth it to buy based on the hope that it gets better or the game gets a surge in popularity.

[sol Invictus]

Originally posted by Dante:

Agreed. It is heavily overpriced and lacks players. The game is early access and has yet to prove itself. Players aren't going to come at this rate if the devs don't adjust their expectations to face the reality of their asking price.

It's a shame. I really think this title looks great and has potential!

Devs do not set their own prices. Publishers do though.

[M82]

Originally posted by flinkenberg:

Originally posted by Vantage:

Well I'd love to join in on the fun but have you looked at these config requirements ? I'm not about to litteraly buy a new PC for a game that doesn't even look that great.

It's actually better optimized than Hell Let Loose to be honest. I play it on RX570 without any significant render quality adjustments with quite decent FPS.
I wish people played this more and I agree the price is not very welcoming although if it had people playing it it's well worth it I would say.

Wanna know what's funny ? I actually got a new PC since then. 3070 and a 4Ghz processor, really mint stuff. Still not gonna buy it because the game is literally empty

[Khanh Le]

I am here to see if I should ask for a refund. Yes I should.

[Agathosdaimon]

this sounds disappointing. BTW looks great but what a waste. if it at least had bots i would buy it

[Midnight]

I think this is a great game playbace hates it I dont get why rely desives more players

[ZeroFuqsGiven]

How is a game ever going to gather a player base if nobody buys the game because it's dead??

[Wombat Combat]

Got it for $4.50 on cdkeys, been enjoying it so far even with half filled servers. Based on the roadmap the game is one year away from version 1.0. As long as updates are good and consistent I believe the player base will experience some steady growth

[kptv ッ]

At the end of the day the game itself is really good with exceptional graphics and audio quality the only thing that puts it down is having a little to none player base with only around 5 - 10 people at MAX playing on the only active server there is, If you want to increase your players you gotta decrease that price and make it affordable for all because if your competing with games like hell let loose and battlefield v then you have to really up your game and listen to what your target audience needs furthermore make a training section where you can just have a AI war on a large scale that is what people need because if you cannot play online who is going to be sitting on a training range for ages, NO-ONE so make a section where you can just fight with and have AI thank you ;)

[YankelMyWankel]

yeah i just wanted to try this out, got it in a bundle i think and there's three servers, the most populated having 14 players on it... what a gyp

[Aegmar]

I own it (got it from some sale i think, can't remember) but never played it..., between Squad and HLL there probably aren't enough players around for this type of game to populate servers across 4 or 5 games of the type..., maybe..

When i want to play a team-based tactical fps i tend to end in Squad because it got the community to often actually support a communicative and somewhat tactical gameplay experience. HLL is fun too, although its a bit weaker in regard how strongly players actually have to depend on each other and can't lonewolf it while staying silent.

BtW might be just one game too much of the kind, most of the potential players are already bound to similar games...

[KillaCyst]

game should be f2p

[Static]

Originally posted by Dante:

Agreed. It is heavily overpriced and lacks players. The game is early access and has yet to prove itself. Players aren't going to come at this rate if the devs don't adjust their expectations to face the reality of their asking price.

It's a shame. I really think this title looks great and has potential!

This is just a money grab. The game is going nowhere and never will. I feel ripped off.