Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Este tópico foi trancado 
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
The same way it works on console. It isn't complicated.
Both players could use a controller, but there are also plenty of games with shared keyboard options for multiplayer. No one ever uses shared keyboard because it's horrible and everyone interested in PC couch co-op has two controllers already, but this isn't a new concept.
There are a several split screen games already, Portal 2 for example is split screen, it's not hard to give the gamers options on whether to split horizontally or vertically and the game already has a zooming out function that could be used to fit more onto each screen. Also, anyone with a $12 accessory can plug their PC into a Plasma Screen TV that's about as cheap as any good monitor but bigger.
The game already has controller support on the console version all they would have to do is port the controls to PC, virtually no actual effort required.
I shouldn't have to, if Split Screen works on console there's no legitimate reason it shouldn't be allowed on PC.
Imposing arbitrary limitations on the PC as a platform so that console gamers have options that PC gamers don't have access to does a disservice to PC gaming.
Just get a spare computer.
If you don't have a spare computer, buy a new one.
If this functionality already exists on consoles why would it be a lot of work to port the same functionality to PC?
A simple google search proves that people have been asking for and asking about split screen compatibility for a long time.
Why should I have to buy another seperate computer to substitute for the lack of options on PC that people have in the Console version of the game?
Computers aren't cheap, for a half decent laptop we're talking at least $400 and then it wouldn't be able to play many games.
I have 2 PC's in my home and i'm quite a poor guy. I've also made no depts aquiring those.
Piggybanks FTW.
But getting a 2nd PC just because of Terraria is out of proportion.
There just was never really a need for split-screen multiplayer on PC, thanks to LAN and Internet, also giving quite a bit of an advantage over splitscreen by removing screencheating. (There actually is a local-mp-only game on steam, all about that subject)
You'll hardly find PC games these days, supporting splitscreen. Most games on steam with local-multiplayer only need a single screen, like all 2D fighting games.
There just isn't a demand for it. I could see Valve in the future trying to make that sort of stuff happen with like "multi-launch support in Big Picture" or some kind of stuff like that, since they're currently seem to desperately trying to appeal to the console gamer, but i wouldn't bet on that.
Ask to yourself, "On what kind of setup do i rather wanna play local multiplayer; On a noisy beast next to a desk, hooked up to a 24" monitor or on a slick console with a 34"+ TV-Screen on the couch?"
I'd consider myself a "PC gamer", but still choose console over PC for local multiplayer games. I probably wouldn't even notice the low resolution and subpar framerates during local mp-fun with friend-o's
Crying over splitscreen on a PC game like this is like crying over spilt milk, and i'm sure some other guys on the forum have said just that, PC gaming isn't known for it's local multiplayer, it's known for it's large-scale competitive combat from games like 2003's Planetside and the large-scale RTS games like Homeworld and Total Annihilation, amazing looking games such as Firefall and GTA5 or sandboxes like this, Minecraft and simulation games like X and Elite Dangerous just to name a few.
Oh and don't get me started on the modding, there are some awesome things the community throws togeather that is even better than what most game developers make nowadays.
Yeah it would be pretty insane to spend a minimum of $400 just so that you can play Terraria with someone in the same room.
I need Split Screen because I don't own two computers and there's no way for me to play two player with someone in the same room.
I don't want to play with someone half a world away, I want to play with someone in the same room, and Terraria already has Split Screen on consoles, I want that same functionality on my PC because I own two controllers and would like to play local games without having to spend a minimum of $400 on a separate PC.
There are several with Split Screen by default and a ton of Local Co-Op games there's even a popular Local Co-Op search tag and gaming sites dedicated to Couch PC games, there are even split screen mods for games that don't support native split screen such as Unreal Tournament 3 Black and Left 4 Dead 2, there's even a hack for Borderlands 2 and a ton of other games that runs multiple instances of an executable and resizes the resolutions to create artifical split screens.
And if a game has Split Screen on console it's stupid for it not to have the same option on PC. That arbitrarily limits what the PC is capable of and arbitrarily restricts PC gamers, it punishes people for playing on PC.
Yes there is a demand for it, that's why there are mods to add split screen to shooters and people and why google search results reveal constant threads about it.
Maybe you never have anyone over who you play games with in the same room, but people who do shouldn't be forced to buy a console or separate PC to access multiplayer features that are in the console version of a PC game.
In case you want to make something feel like splitscreen i'd suggest that.
Geez, i've known the difference between LAN, splitscreen and online since i was like 7 i'd expect a gamer at your age would at least be able to tell the difference between LAN and online.
Playing lan requires that someone have access to multiple computers you literally just said it's a "rich man's multiplayer" it's only for people in privileged circumstances. I'd have to drop a minimum of $400 to do it, and even if I had multiple computers it often isn't as satisfying as playing on the same screen with a friend, and I don't have space for multiple people to sit at multiple computers comfortably. What you're suggesting is unreasonable.
I just want to play two player on the same screen on my PC, console gamers can why shouldn't PC gamers be able to?
Haha who would buy a whole other PC just to play ONE game
People do it all the time. It's called "Multiplayer."
This is just going to be another one of those threads where an OP wants to have everything all in one place so I don't see what the point would be in arguing about this any further. It just doesn't work that way; Re-logic gave the PC and console versions different content and different capabilities for a reason. Split-screen capability is common for console games because multiplayer was introduced prior to the introduction of WiFi whereas PC games have only been using multiple-screen gaming for as long as the internet has been around.
If you don't like having to use multiple PC's for a multiplayer game or you absolutely NEED to have split-screen capability for some other reason then get the console version. It will cost more but you've demonstrated here that you're getting desperate enough to do it anyway. Otherwise, just deal with the differences between the two versions and stop acting like a spoiled brat.