Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
-
Attacking towns/farms/resource sites, etc, is something the AI likes to do to annoy the player. Enemy armies that go into these towns will damage the town itself and the region will not gain the resource from that town. Should you do this though? No, it's not beneficial.
Attacking the towns just means that you may have to repair the damage you brought upon the land itself once you've taken the region. That's just wasting money and losing the potential gain from the region you took if you hadn't destroyed the towns.
"Oh, but perhaps we could cause unrest in the region for a spawned rebellion." Don't think too complex. This game really is too simple to grasp that it can be disappointing. Don't worry about complexities in this game, there are none.
So, yes. Attacking the enemies armies and taking the capital of a region is better than destroying the outlying towns.
-
Yes, it is a shame that the world is huge, but the provinces are small, unfortunately. Again, too ambitious for its time and many bumps in development. A darn shame, indeed. France should be multiple regions. Many regions should be split and divided, but, alas, this is what we've got. It makes the game easy to conquer, but less fun overall.
Thanks for the reply. I thought that was the case. Might be worth it if your in a prolonged war or if taking the capitol could be very costly, then maybe cutting off their resources and causing civil unrest could be worth it. But, yea be-lining the capitol is the best method.
I can see what you mean about the game being ambitious. Having both the Indian and American maps are cool, I also really like the naval fight for dominance of the lucrative trade zones. I had a cool thing where I was on an offensive against the native american tribes. The pirates attacked my port, the naval battle did not go well & I lost my navy. Due to the lack of infrastructure in my colonies, to continue the offensive and deal with the pirates I was forced to raise an army & strong navy in London, then send it to the colonies. Where as in newer Total War games, replacing lost armies and navies is easy & there is little consequence to loosing battles.
The only thing worth destroying is the main trade port since keeping it destroyed (or blockaded) long enough can and will bankrupt the AI.