安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Battles are very different. In land battles, the fatigue system is used to represent unit cohesion and you're likely to need to rest units more (for example, resting cavalry in between charges). Morale is much more fragile - militia are wavering if they aren't near your general, even before taking casualties and cavalry can break on contact with another unit.
Battles tend to take much longer (on land, musket fire is less accurate; on sea, hulls are much stronger). I enjoyed this in land battles and found it a bit frustrating in sea battles. While I understand the thinking behind these changes - muskets were inaccurate, ships tends to flee or be captured rather than sink - I found it a bit frustrating to rake an enemy warship but not damage even one enemy cannon.
Factions have unique research trees and can't trade technologies, adding to faction diversity. More factions are playable (although they won't all unit rosters which are as well-developed as those of France and Britain, for example).