Game gets worse every patch, just switch to TFT

[TheGREENMAN]

Honestly TFT is so much better. Backed by competent devs too, not ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who ♥♥♥♥ the game up every patch.

[Lonestead]

No 2k Injoker 「罰」님이 먼저 게시:

Yup, dead end. The last two patches focused on shorten the games and buff high-roling. This is turning slowly into just another mobile game targeting casuals. Artifact has shown that thats not their expertise. They are now sacrifying gameplay to get there, while not noticing that this target audience needs different marketing strategies etc. and fighting a losing battle as Riot knows better. Fanboying will just lead to absolute dead, thats how hearthstone turned to ♥♥♥♥ as well as blizzard did prefer to listen to sugar coaters till they crossed point of no return. I wonder at this point if there even can be a strategy game with lack of mechanical skills that can satisfy the classic hardcore gamer, maybe this is just the dead end for us in general if even valve goes now after the money of casuals.

Autochess was a very casual game to begin with and it had/has is audience as a dota 2 mod. And all changes made so far by valve did't make it any more or less casual. Maybe you are not the target audience or realize what this game is for? I play this game to relax from work or from more hardcore games, not to become the biggest pro in the world. At this the game is very good.

[Hraju co mi dají]

TFT sucks

[Coach Ant]

The Greenman yes being in low ranked sucks but you cab get out of it , this game is amazing you just need to rethink your game plan the dev change this game for the better you gonna always have nerfs and bufs just learn how to adapt and read up on resouces that are out there to better yourself in this game the internet is a wonderful thing . and work on builds that you like playing and make them better. P.s rome wasnt build in one day just take everyfay to get better in this game

[veiledsister]

No 2k Injoker 「罰」님이 먼저 게시:

Yup, dead end. The last two patches focused on shorten the games and buff high-roling. This is turning slowly into just another mobile game targeting casuals. Artifact has shown that thats not their expertise. They are now sacrifying gameplay to get there, while not noticing that this target audience needs different marketing strategies etc. and fighting a losing battle as Riot knows better. Fanboying will just lead to absolute dead, thats how hearthstone turned to ♥♥♥♥ as well as blizzard did prefer to listen to sugar coaters till they crossed point of no return. I wonder at this point if there even can be a strategy game with lack of mechanical skills that can satisfy the classic hardcore gamer, maybe this is just the dead end for us in general if even valve goes now after the money of casuals.

You call people fanboys, but at the same time you're show all the signs of fanboy. You are hilarious...

[Lonestead]

VeiledSister님이 먼저 게시:

No 2k Injoker 「罰」님이 먼저 게시:

Yup, dead end. The last two patches focused on shorten the games and buff high-roling. This is turning slowly into just another mobile game targeting casuals. Artifact has shown that thats not their expertise. They are now sacrifying gameplay to get there, while not noticing that this target audience needs different marketing strategies etc. and fighting a losing battle as Riot knows better. Fanboying will just lead to absolute dead, thats how hearthstone turned to ♥♥♥♥ as well as blizzard did prefer to listen to sugar coaters till they crossed point of no return. I wonder at this point if there even can be a strategy game with lack of mechanical skills that can satisfy the classic hardcore gamer, maybe this is just the dead end for us in general if even valve goes now after the money of casuals.

You call people fanboys, but at the same time you're show all the signs of fanboy. You are hilarious...

More like a wannabe fanboy wanting to turn the whole genre into something different

[24/7🔴Triple B>Backpacks/Keys]

Every patch its just same kids crying because they can't adapt to new changes and don't learn new meta because think they know everything after a day LMAO.

Move to TFT, we don't want you crying baby kids.

[Kreuz]

forsenCD님이 먼저 게시:

Every patch its just same kids crying because they can't adapt to new changes and don't learn new meta and think they know everything after a day LMAO XD

Move to TFT, we don't want you crying baby kids.

I also suspect that riot payed people to come here and start "not worth it, tft is better" threads and with every patch when people who can't adapt start to complain they crawl out of their holes again to "kindly redirect" us to tft

[Clifford]

welcome to open beta

[aghabozorg]

game is in the early access stage.give them time.the only thing that i dont like about this patch is damage receiving that makes games shorter. btw TFT sucks

[1]

I really don't get the point of making the alliance item into 3 random tier . It only confuse us all and adding RNG to the game.

[Garbhus]

In my opinion, this change in alliance item is a joke of bad taste. Are you trying to turn the game into a lottery? RNG that already exists, do you want to add more?
Yes, TFT is winning the autochess fight. Instead of making some more alliances viables in meta, DEVs in this game are adding RNG to them.
I do not know who the DEV is responsible for this, but he certainly does not know what his playerbase wants: Less RNG and more alliance options! Simple is not it?

[Enako]

Stupid update. I deleted game after 1 game updated. Suck gameplay ever

[Kreuz]

Garbhus님이 먼저 게시:

In my opinion, this change in alliance item is a joke of bad taste. Are you trying to turn the game into a lottery? RNG that already exists, do you want to add more?
Yes, TFT is winning the autochess fight. Instead of making some more alliances viables in meta, DEVs in this game are adding RNG to them.
I do not know who the DEV is responsible for this, but he certainly does not know what his playerbase wants: Less RNG and more alliance options! Simple is not it?

I like that change. In my opinion this change provides exactly that. more options in which alliance to go for because the strength of their global items isn't set in stone and therefore, some are just better than others because of the global item alone (compare your pickrate of hunters focus, retaliate, coordinated assault, final flash vs font of creation, completing the circle and vicious intent, pre and postpatch)

I think it made the meta more diverse and less about pursuing two-three metabuilds, hoping I get their globals (RNG) to get an advantage because all others are pursuing the same 2-3 metabuilds.
Now I can decide by the strength of the items offered to me, which will be one of the better alliances this game simply because I got a early T2 vicious intent f.e. and can go for summons early game.

[TheNick2003]

TheGREENMAN님이 먼저 게시:

Honestly TFT is so much better. Backed by competent devs too, not dip♥♥♥♥♥ who ♥♥♥♥ the game up every patch.

Go cry somewhere else pls we dont need you

[★ Danceman ★]

I played TFT and hated it. The interface for example is so awful compared to Underlords in my opinion