I want DLC badly...

[emo_deku5]

I am happy with the game that we got. and I understand it took years off of the developer's lives. but getting somewhat consistent paid and/or free DLC with things like new characters and story missions, would be very nice to get. edit: the main thing I truly want is more characters that I can swap out. like seriously I do not need the Australian. and would instead want to switch it out for someone actually useful, like a character designed for crowd control, maybe they have a shotgun and grenades. but honestly I'm happy as long as there are actually new interesting characters

[sdumitriu]

Even though they look like guns, in regular combat the wizards don't shoot guns, but "tactical brooms". They don't shoot penetrating bullets, but pushy spells. They do just a little damage by themselves, that's why you need to prioritize knockback.

[emo_deku5]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย soppyamoeba8402:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย emo_deku5:

I have reached the ending. none of them get shot there so I don't know what you're talking about (and if you're going to talk about the one scene where they get poisoned and then get shot so they can be revived, that really does not count. and that is also the main reason why I said "they canonically don't get shot that often")

What about combat?

combat isn't Canon. unless there is a moment that is vital to the story you cannot prove that what you experienced is actually the way that the story was.

[emo_deku5]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย sdumitriu:

Even though they look like guns, in regular combat the wizards don't shoot guns, but "tactical brooms". They don't shoot penetrating bullets, but pushy spells. They do just a little damage by themselves, that's why you need to prioritize knockback.

ok...


what does that have to do with anything?

[soppyamoeba8402]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย sdumitriu:

Even though they look like guns, in regular combat the wizards don't shoot guns, but "tactical brooms". They don't shoot penetrating bullets, but pushy spells. They do just a little damage by themselves, that's why you need to prioritize knockback.

I was talking about ENEMY GUNS

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย emo_deku5:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย soppyamoeba8402:

What about combat?

combat isn't Canon. unless there is a moment that is vital to the story you cannot prove that what you experienced is actually the way that the story was.

Well, what happens during combat is kinda cannon,after all when do you recruit the druid mafia guy? how does dall join you? during combat. What about the ending heist? or the tutorial? combat IS cannon a lot of the times, due to it telling part of the story (and on't expect every mission in-lore to go perfectly)

[sdumitriu]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย emo_deku5:

ok...


what does that have to do with anything?

It has to do with this:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย soppyamoeba8402:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย emo_deku5:

because A they only get knocked out (seriously every single person in this game Never Dies, if you paid attention to dialogue you would know this) B because of the necromedic just Reviving people

They never die, even when shot? (especialy before banks the necromedic joins)

And I was saying that they don't get shot with bullets, they get shot with magic, which mostly just pushes people around. So no, they don't die even when shot.

[soppyamoeba8402]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย sdumitriu:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย emo_deku5:

ok...


what does that have to do with anything?

It has to do with this:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย soppyamoeba8402:

They never die, even when shot? (especialy before banks the necromedic joins)

And I was saying that they don't get shot with bullets, they get shot with magic, which mostly just pushes people around. So no, they don't die even when shot.

...WHY WOULD A TRERRORIST ORGANIZATION SHOT IT'S ENEMIES WITH NON-LETHAL WEAPONS, I WAS TALKING ABOUT YOUR CHARACTERS GERRING SHOT.

[emo_deku5]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย soppyamoeba8402:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย sdumitriu:

It has to do with this:


And I was saying that they don't get shot with bullets, they get shot with magic, which mostly just pushes people around. So no, they don't die even when shot.

...WHY WOULD A TRERRORIST ORGANIZATION SHOT IT'S ENEMIES WITH NON-LETHAL WEAPONS, I WAS TALKING ABOUT YOUR CHARACTERS GERRING SHOT.

I actually do kind of agree with this one. especially because they do use lethal weapons. seriously if you look at any of the weapons on the enemies they are clearly modern-day Weaponry that you can see in real life. the heavy dude has a machine gun, all the basic soldiers have basic assault rifles. and ALL of them never really use spells, the only enemies that do spells are named characters. (the only spells that they have been seen using are basic ones like "predictive blast" or something like that I forget the name)

[tursel]

If you guys like TBW for the gameplay, I think you should try out Druidstone that came out in 2019, and is -80% in almost every sale.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/954650/Druidstone_The_Secret_of_the_Menhir_Forest/

Tactical Breach Wizards might have taken a lot of inspiration from that game, since it is basically a mix between Into The Breach and Druidstone. For example:

- The gameplay is similar, with more puzzle style of levels that you can replay
- Enemy health and armor system is similar, also no there are no randomness for damage or hits.
- Druidstone has "undo move" (unlimited usages, but not usable after action), and a rewind for the whole turn (only 1 usage per scenario though)
- Druidstone has emphasis on manipulating character/enemy positioning, pushing the enemies to pits/traps/etc, though not as prevalent as defenestration in TBW
- Druidstone Oiko's teleport-swap is similar to Dall's swap, also many other skills are similar
- Skills are limited times per scenario (same as TBW), and you can get more usages from a few spellbooks per level (same as evidence in TBW)
- Druidstone optional objectives are basically same as confidence goals
- Druidstone gems are basically same as perk points

So if you are looking for more and don't mind the generic fantasy theme, I'd say check it out.

[emo_deku5]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย tursel:

If you guys like TBW for the gameplay, I think you should try out Druidstone that came out in 2019, and is -80% in almost every sale.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/954650/Druidstone_The_Secret_of_the_Menhir_Forest/

Tactical Breach Wizards might have taken a lot of inspiration from that game, since it is basically a mix between Into The Breach and Druidstone. For example:

- The gameplay is similar, with more puzzle style of levels that you can replay
- Enemy health and armor system is similar, also no there are no randomness for damage or hits.
- Druidstone has "undo move" (unlimited usages, but not usable after action), and a rewind for the whole turn (only 1 usage per scenario though)
- Druidstone has emphasis on manipulating character/enemy positioning, pushing the enemies to pits/traps/etc, though not as prevalent as defenestration in TBW
- Druidstone Oiko's teleport-swap is similar to Dall's swap, also many other skills are similar
- Skills are limited times per scenario (same as TBW), and you can get more usages from a few spellbooks per level (same as evidence in TBW)
- Druidstone optional objectives are basically same as confidence goals
- Druidstone gems are basically same as perk points

So if you are looking for more and don't mind the generic fantasy theme, I'd say check it out.

this literally has nothing to do with the conversation or anything adjacent to. like I don't understand why you're going out of your way to promote this game.

[tursel]

You asked for DLC as in new content.

I thought while you wait, you might be interested in a similar game experience, which could fill the void. Or maybe it would help someone else looking for more content. But I guess not.

[emo_deku5]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย tursel:

You asked for DLC as in new content.

I thought while you wait, you might be interested in a similar game experience, which could fill the void. Or maybe it would help someone else looking for more content. But I guess not.

that's fair. seems like a good game, doesn't really seem like I would be interested. (mostly due to the style of the art)