Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
Streembit limited grants you a revocable, non exclusive, non transferable, limited licence to download, install and use the game solely for your personal non commercial purposes strictly in accordance with the terms of this agreement.
Modification to application:
Streembit limited reserves the right to modify, suspend or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, the game or any service that it connects, with or without notice and without liability to you.
the fact that the EULA was introduced post purchase I have no interest in agreeing to the draconian practices of businesses pushing their customers to strip them of their ability to modify the game, post gameplay footage for entertainment purposes and or video review. I have zero interest in signing any EULA that allows its publishers or developers to remove a users ability to play the game, modify or generally take away a customers ability to access purchased content for as little a reason as "wrong say" which is what the Modification to application claus holds under its vague umbrella.
multiplayer online games may get a pass on such EULA content as modifications may lead and often do lead to unfair changes to user abilities but for single player games, there is no need for such an agreement.
after having expressed these concerns before and no action was taken to remedy and was rejected. I would like to point out the rug pull and ask for my money back.
They may as well just axe EULA in 1.0 unless they plan on having a multiplayer mode. Unless they plan on going after monitized content creators on some kind of social media platform.
you may very well be hitting the nail on the head there. still, if they aren't willing to come to some kind of compromise, I may just start posting screen shots of the EULA on their page, make more discussions like this, just shine as big a light on this topic as much as possible.
Plenty of Single player games come with EULA.
LOL.
Doesn't even begin to make sense to complain about it for this game.
IT's literally just a thing basically many many games do.
Nothing special.
Nothing draconian.
some people watch a small liberty be taken here and there and think "meh it doesn't concern me." they will watch others taken from them and still think, "meh, still doesn't bother me. but hey this guy is speaking up about it... I'm gonna jab at that guy." tomorrow or next week it may still not bother those people but later on there are those that spoke up in history and people laughed at but are now recognized. This is one issue and its merely a stepping stone. and I'm gonna stand up and say that its going the wrong way. I wont support this. maybe ask yourself why do you need to sign a contract to play a game? especially after you purchased it. especially when every other purchase you make that requires a contract signed before you even proceed with the financial transaction.
Your claims here make zero sense ever.
You cannot claim this is evil or bad, or trying to control anyone.
Do not make up nonsense.
Please pay attention to how EULA actually work.
It's not even legally defendable in court.
And besides, it's not even a huge issue ever.
No one can claim it's part of a giant conspiracy.
In OP's defense if you want to go ahead and criticize someone for a bad take I recommend going to X.
OP entirely had the decision to buy this and saw that in fine print if you played for over 2 hours or more you'd void your refund.
considering the recent introduction of the EULA and it wasn't something that existed before spring of 2024. that alone should be something that supersedes the original purchase agreement conditions but steam doesn't protect against this because its not a common occurrence and the moderator hasn't come across this before and defaulted to the most basic business practices which is, its not my problem, therefore its not a problem... rejected rather than identifying that the game didn't originally have any waver to sign, they didn't have a EULA available and now unless you agree to accept the terms and conditions the game is little more than a bloated wallpaper.
but this isn't just this EULA that is being disputed. its to help put on record the comparison of events to prevent other bad actors from releasing a game only to hide other terms and conditions post purchase of the product. are these devs threatening you for modifying the game in the future? hopefully not. but that has happened with tencent when they purchased techland against a game modder who released the mod IAMLEGION. the difference between that instance and this instance. techland had included their EULA and a TOS upon launch of the game ensuring that there was no room for misinterpretation which if your going to be a B then be the whole B which is what they did but Streembit Limited waffled on releasing the EULA for 3 years and now all of a sudden they want to slap some legal jargon on the game and hold everyone in contempt to sign an agreement? I ask, why aren't more people seeing this and saying "hey, jerks, that's not right!"