安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
ouch
Maybe,
I sure you, i'm not that kind of person who argue on the other's degree with being Absolute certainty (or even mocking them) on the business like that business(wo)man knows nothing about the business but me as a art teacher.
So
You are the Businesswoman, lawyer or the T2's Staff right? or at least knowledgeable person with your own studies on the business's laws?
Will you tell me by which laws, wen one company (T2) have a 2 companies (2K and Rockstar), how much the mother company (T2) can have a control on his companies by the law?
Also (by the law) How much they can able to set a same goal or strategy and (for most important part in our conversation) How much they are limited by the law to not co-operate and make their decisions together?
-----------------------------------
At the end ((**summary**))
-----------------------------------
"Looking forward to learn the amount of law limitations for co-operations of 2 or 3 companies with the same owner."
I believe They are changing the position of each series in the History of the gaming world, for the GTA goods, while still making money from this series till it have old fan base but i dont believe they will keep it at the end. still i hope (as a positive person) that im looking to negative on what T2/2K is doing.
But anyway, you are a good reviewer.