Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Κανόνες συζητήσεων και οδηγίες
Αναφορά ανάρτησης
The main reason why you get responses like this is because you aren't coming off as worried and having concerns, you aren't even asking questions; you come off as aggravated and hostile, being incredibly rude and also very harshly critical about a game you haven't even played nor own. That's admittedly why I replied to the thread. You were being overwhelmingly divisive and small-minded instead of being willing to have reasonable and genuine conversations with people.
You can cherry-pick my quote, but I said that because you haven't been very constructive and open for genuine conversation, just extremely hostile and argumentative. It's why I mentioned how all of my friends who played the original see this as a fantastic remake, because, according to you, anyone who 'played the original' would see how bad this remake supposedly is.
If you want more polite responses, please be more polite and less divisive yourself, and have an actual open mind to listen to what other people are saying, instead of just shouting at the top of your lungs about how everyone else is stupid or wrong, on a game you haven't even played.
So you're dictating a character's competence based on a person's performance? There was no hide and seek tactic, you either killed everyone or you don't in the original, wtf are you talking about? There's 7 bad guys, four of which are in the dining area that you can't avoid without shooting them (i.e using your guns).
I fail to see this game is less plausible than the original when you had to dispatch the same amount of people in the very few ways the game offers you to do so. I don't role play Tommy being incompetent in the old game as it seems you are doing, so I never got the impression he was a 'nervous driver' who doesn't know how to shoot because I know how to play the game well and in doing so, I can make Tommy look like he's been killing bad guys for years.
You don't own the game, you haven't played it and you're just another one who is extremely bitter for some reason? I bet you were one of the brigade who said this will score less than 50 on Metacritic and would have mostly negative user ratings on Steam. Sorry you've been disappointed
I watch often just the Negative Reviews to see what People complain about and if it would bother me. Ofcourse if they just write: "Meh, bad Game."
Than yes, thats not Helpful. But most of the Time the Positive Reviews are the lazy ones and the Negative ones are the Helpful ones since People mostly state the bad things they get annoyed by, or the reasons why they gave a bad review.. or its Review bombing for some reason.
But yes, you can play this Game 2 ways.. but from my Experience, the Positive Reviews are often more misleading and less honest than the Negative ones.
Mafia Remake is still much better game, period.
Sorry for delay, I have some physical damages/pains,
The original Mafia was under the development for more than 4 years and finished in 2000, the publisher delayed it for 1 year to release it, meanwhile Rockstar make a gta 3 in a 1.5 year and released it months before the Mafia release.
Later on the T2-2K (the owner of the rockstar) brought the Mafia tittle (IP) and the Developers company of it.
2K changed the Developers company to its own name.
And after almost finishing the the Mafia 2 development, 2K make the legendary artist/director/write like Daniel Vavra to leaved the Mafia 2 project near the end,
They forced the rest of the developers to remove some lore of the game like the bus, trains and limited number of heavy weapons to carry on and etc.
Still the Mafia 2 was a successful tittle for the players and critics, mostly in the parts of decent writing and directing of the work. (and sure how much details it have from the co-workers on it)
Then 2K kicked out the rest of developers right after the success of the sale.
Years later, even wen the Mafia 1 had/have a big fan base and sale, 2K removed it from the Steam.
After the heavy attacks of fans, 2K bring it back to the market but with the removed some audio files in the name of copyright, (while any none brain dead person knows how much old musics are cheap to buy)
Meanwhile they polished gta 3 while not only damaging Mafia but also didn't adding at least wide screen support.
Then 2K brought some newbie developers to make Mafia 3,
The main character of the Mafia 3 was someone totally out of Mafia family/category who slaughter families/characters/category of classic mafioso. that was the "the end", "finishing move" on this series.
Now wen at least people knows the original Mafia as a father of the games like gta, saint sow, godfather, scarface and etc. In the remake, they removed all side quest, free time between the missions, free rides on the main camping and etc. like this game was never the open world but the liner adventure.
No need to mention that they removed everything that gta series haven't them from the start.
Or, let say it was hard for the developers to bring that details, so one question i have, we had a button to turn on/off the cars engine while sitting in the car. it had a great impression wen was waiting for something and etc. while placing the option like this will need a few minutes of the work, why they didn't even put this one?
And someone here say:
Disrespecting is laughable? this game is saving the series from what? the 2K it self?
Final world:
2K may have a plan to make a Mafia series from Open world to the liner cinematic genre,
And if they just done some mistakes with the fans and original developers but all with the good willing, they can apologies for disrespecting accidental or at least explained whats happened in the details, they can care and repair the damaged the Original Mafia (at least as its one of the most important games in our history). and i promise all the old school fans will be here buying the 2K games again happily, personally i have many 2K games on my 3 launchers and i truly don't want to stop buying and enjoying the great tittle that 2K brought in.
No need to mention that wen the taxi driver on his first mission use the knife like he have a 40 years of criminal background is not showing that they do know what they are doing, if they are doing something with the good will.
This is right, but early development of Mafia 3 was hellish due to internal differences followed with multiple reboots and rewrites. now they're no longer a independent studio and must follow publisher' timeframe.
They gave them what, like 2 years? and they have done nothing, still a concept phase. what do you expect to 2K to do?
Subjective, Debatable. maybe in eastern europe, but not in west.
What makes you think music publising labels would value older musics for less? and Mafia 1 has like, majority of its soundtrack filled with licensed tracks. And after the heavy attacks of fans? They don't care about those, remember when T2 tried to rub out the whole GTA modding scene? Back then it was actually Rockstar who talked them about it.
edit: quote format broke for some reason
.. You got your facts mixed up, here. Daniel Vavra left the project on his own accord because of disagreements to how Mafia 2 should be written, and as such he left the team. He's been directly harassing or scolding developers and actors associated with future releases ever since, even going so far as to harass individual actors whom played in Mafia: Definitive Edition, and trying to say that Mafia: DE is a ruined and disrespectful version of the original Mafia because Definitive Edition has things like explosive barrels, which.. Uh.. Are literally in the original Mafia.
This video documents the silliness quite well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi4ANxW0vhE&feature=youtu.be
Patently false. 2K is not at all the owner of Rockstar, i'm genuinely not sure where you got this information. Take-Two is the owner of Rockstar.
Erm.. No, they did not. Take-Two and Rockstar did. 2K and Hangar 13 were completely unrelated to the GTA series.
That isn't true. Mafia 3 was under development for a long time but was in development hell for quite a while. 2K Czech was working on Mafia 3 but the company had to get restructured due to failing to generate enough revenue after multiple failed projects that never saw the light of day, their version of Mafia 3 being one of them. 2K had hired the new studio, Hangar 13, to develop Mafia 3, but the studio being new doesn't mean that the developers were new, as it featured many employees from various companies like LucasArts and was filled with experienced developers and employees who had left their original careers specifically to work at Hangar 13.
This was always the general plot for Mafia 3.
It literally includes free-roam, but the campaign became a more linear experience due to public reception from Mafia 3. free-roam is also filled with side quests, secrets, easter eggs, collectables, and more.
Not sure what this means. I'm also not sure what GTA has to do with this.
If you were to ask me, it's because the engine automatically turns off when you park in most missions. You required a LUA script to turn engines on and off in Mafia 2, after all.
You seem very confused and misinformed, my friend.
I can't believe the OP thought 2K owned Rockstar and GTA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_(company)
2K is basically Take-Two. I can't believe someone can be that stupid to not see it in the name or at least google it.
Will put a time and replay the respectful comments later on.
Do-.. Do you seriously not know how Companies work? Like, for real? This is a genuine question.
The closest you got is that Rockstar and 2K are owned by the same company. But 2K does not own Rockstar. I don't even know how you got this confused, 2K was bought by Take-Two far after Rockstar was.
If you need me to spell it out for you, Take-Two is 2K's parent company. That means Take-Two bought them. Take-Two is Rockstar's parent company. That means Take-Two bought them. Both studios used to be self-dependent, however Take-Two funds them both. Otherwise, 2K and Rockstar are two entirely separate publisher entities which hold their own development studios. They still develop games independently and handle their own executive decisions, as both Rockstar and 2K have their own development studios underneath them. 2K has literally nothing to do with GTA outside of having the same parent company, but they have literally 0 decisions on what happens with that franchise.
What you're saying, is like saying DreamWorks Animation owns Universal Animation Studios, because they have the same parent company (Comcast).
I'm not even being rude, i'm genuinely trying to correct you, here.