Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you have a DLSS capabable GPU, i assume your running a more high end one. Theres hardly any reason to actually use it instead of native high rest. SE5 and all SE games are very light on hardware, so you wont even have bad FPS.
As for the 1.0 over 2.0, thats a good question consdering 2.0 is closer to DLSS and that should probably be the go to.
I use UWQHD monitor(3440x1440) my PC has MSI RTX 2070 ARMOR 8GB OCed +160 on Core clock and 500+ on Memory clock ,Intel Core I5 8600K OCed to 4.5GHz,16GB 2400MHz ram,NVMe SSD for Windows and normal one that i use for games,Windows 11 and while playing on High settings on native res i get 50-70 fps with unstable frametime(That's why i decided to use AMD FX super res) when i use AMD FX super res on best Quality option i get 70-90 with stable frametime but the problem is even on super quality setting it's still blurry compared to DLSS in other games for example DLSS on Perfomance option in Dying Light 2 looks so much better than AMD FX super res on best quality settings in Sniper that probably wouldn't be a problem if they included 2.0 version instead of 1.0 because i've heard it's close to DLSS