Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But we made CS to have replay value, and we made BH to be a play-once experience. It's great that some people want to play it through more than once, but it's 30 hours at least to finish a first playthrough. They both appeal to different sides of our fan base (Lantern vs Rose? Winter vs Heart?) and I regularly see negative reviews on one from people who loved the other.
WF III (current codename) will be different again. 🙃
also interesting to see that book of hours has that much more text than CS, and that even people that agree can have different definitions of what "content" means. always interesting to be confronted by my own implicit biases.
I do have an issue with book of hours' UI because the cards are the worst of all worlds for someone like me with bad eyesight and ADHD. when's they're too big they take up too much of the screen and cause issues with finding things and doing things cause ADHD but shrinking them makes them borderline unreadable because eyesight. putting this here cause I never did remember to submit formal feedback on that.
anyway <3 from me at least
House of Light looks very promising so far. I just really hope the cooking system will get a better interface than crafting one -_-
Love BoH but would not probably play it again through and through due to content being exhausted in 1-and-around-half run so same here.
Sweet.