FINAL FANTASY VIII - REMASTERED

FINAL FANTASY VIII - REMASTERED

View Stats:
This topic has been locked
Marusame Aug 30, 2019 @ 9:57am
GF Siren has been censored
Ill concede and say ultimecia is mostly fine and I jumped the gun on this, still Ill leave the comparison below just so people know what the remaster version looks like.

Ultimecia
https://i.imgur.com/Y2nuTq2.jpg Original
https://i.imgur.com/NoxIRJ4.png Original better quality(from the fandom wikia)
https://i.imgur.com/QKQBVfV.jpg Remaster
Siren/Rinoa
https://i.imgur.com/GKfYvgN.png FF8 Original
https://i.imgur.com/4yLjgna.png FF8 Remaster

It seems that Shiva is not censored, though I am still unsure about Ultimecia Final Form because in order to do that in hd they pretty much have to draw out blue shaded bare breasts which I dont think they have the balls to do.
Last edited by Marusame; Sep 15, 2019 @ 4:08pm
< >
Showing 586-600 of 702 comments
Chaika Trabant Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:18am 
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I asked one user to prove that the game has been censored and that these character changes aren't an artistic play, and they never replied, because there is no refutable evidence to prove otherwise.
In the same way, can you prove the opposite?

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I don't think its censorship, I get called an SJW censor apologist which is laughable if anyone in here knew me
No one here know each other, we can only judge based on what is posted.
If people think you're an SJW, then either you're one or you have serious communication issues.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
This thread got way out of hand about 15 pages ago and any respectable mod would have seen that.
You're basically asking mod to close a thread where people can express themselves.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
Yeah
You're wondering why people think of you as they currently do and these kind of posts do not do you any favors.
How mature of you to not just ignore my post.
Originally posted by Chaika Trabant:
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I asked one user to prove that the game has been censored and that these character changes aren't an artistic play, and they never replied, because there is no refutable evidence to prove otherwise.
In the same way, can you prove the opposite?

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I don't think its censorship, I get called an SJW censor apologist which is laughable if anyone in here knew me
No one here know each other, we can only judge based on what is posted.
If people think you're an SJW, then either you're one or you have serious communication issues.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
This thread got way out of hand about 15 pages ago and any respectable mod would have seen that.
You're basically asking mod to close a thread where people can express themselves.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
Yeah
You're wondering why people think of you as they currently do and these kind of posts do not do you any favors.
How mature of you to not just ignore my post.

If you're going to censor siren then why not shiva as well? My original thread even had a source link that directed to an article involving the original character designer from 1998 where he stated (in 1998) that all GFs were intended to be naked (no clothes) and that siren was intended to have fathers instead of hair..

That's my proof that siren isn't censored and instead is an artistic play of how the original character designer wanted her to look..


So again prove to me using refutable offical evidence from anyone at Square Enix that she has been censored.



How does being called an SJW mean that I have a communication problem? I got called an SJW for saying this game isn't censored, which part of that is my fault? Or are you saying being called an SJW is justified because my opinion?
It's easy for people on here to just blame SJWs because of things they don't like.

Also I gave you a childish reply to a childish accusation.
Originally posted by Just Chill:
Originally posted by Chaika Trabant:
Fourth, you really, really want to see this thread closed, aren't you?

I am pretty sure that she just wants to know why her own thread got closed but this one didn't.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
A discussion which is a conversation based on opinions normally has an outcome though, if that's an agreement or disagreement, it normally has an ending...

That is the definition, but like always when it comes to humans, they don't act by a definition.
And I cannot blame them for, as that's either a thing what makes them a human.


Oh and if people come back to a similar thread and repeat what they said in another one, that's just a good sign.
A sign that they stick to their opinions.

It's just problematic if they want to use that opinion to convince someone else, who doesn't share that opinion.

There is no need to convince anyone here anyways.

Some people think Siren got censored, I don't have so good assumptions about why her model got changed either, BUT...
I definitely am sure about that this model change was unnecessary when it comes to censoring.
As the original model was already censored.
If it would have been "uncensored" we could have seen a vagina and the game would have rated adult!
THAT WAS NEVER EVER THE CASE!

So, my point is and always was that the model change was out of purpose similar to Squall's redesign.

The thing is, that I can draw some bad conclusions about why they changed Siren, when I cannot with Squall.
He doesn't look like the Squall from the FMVs so his appearance is a bit odd. I don't get why they did that.

But for Siren, the fair conclusion is that she looks a bit more covered now.
She didn't need that feather skirt in the older versions, so I wonder why she needs it now.




But again, it's just one minor model change when I actually pitty Squall's change way more. :(

I think squalls change was probably due to either that they already had the model from dissidia and decided to run with that, or they tried making him look like his FMV and didn't like his design (I was never a fan of his original design anyway so no loss of sleep on my part), obviously for a game of 20 years even a designer can change his taste on his own creations.

I think squalls in game model fits the look of everyone else as well, if he looked like his FMV he would look out of place... If that makes sense?
Chaos Residue Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:55am 
Originally posted by Chaika Trabant:
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I asked one user to prove that the game has been censored and that these character changes aren't an artistic play, and they never replied, because there is no refutable evidence to prove otherwise.
In the same way, can you prove the opposite?

The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the defender. The people crying "censorship!" have provided no proof that there is censorship. But while we can't disprove censorship (because how do you prove something didn't happen?) we can prove that it's unlikely. Here's the proof for that:
  1. The original game did not contain nudity. If it had the game would not have been able to maintain a Teen rating. A "bush" would have still counted as nudity.
  2. The original Siren did not contain clothing, but rather everything was covered up with feathers. Source: http://shmuplations.com/ff8/
    Originally posted by Tetsuya Nomura:
    For the same reason I re-designed Siren from FF4 to not have any clothing, too.
    Siren appears as a woman with animalistic features. In place for blonde hair she has golden bird wings extend from her head. Her body is slightly covered by feathers (more so in the Remastered version). She is barefoot and has purple claws. Her eyes are purple and she holds a green harp.
  3. The change in Siren's design was done by the original artist.
  4. Shiva was not censored.
  5. Ultimecia was not censored.
These are all very strong indicators that this is not censorship. Meanwhile, "your" side has no strong indicators that it's censorship other than "it's different and I have an opinion why". If the evidence points towards A, why are you people so staunchly crying B?

Originally posted by Chaika Trabant:
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I don't think its censorship, I get called an SJW censor apologist which is laughable if anyone in here knew me
No one here know each other, we can only judge based on what is posted.
If people think you're an SJW, then either you're one or you have serious communication issues.

People called me the same thing, and it was after I said I hate SquareEnix and that this was a lazy, garbage job of a remaster. It's not a miscommunication issue, and it's not that we're SJWs. It's that people on this forum attack people who disagree with them. I said "no censorship" and suddenly I'm a "devs white knight", an "SJW", and other more colorful terms. A difference of opinion doesn't make name-calling appropriate, especially when there's more evidence for our opinion that it's not censorship than for the people saying it is censorship. And your post is ridiculous. You're blaming the victim without doing any research.
Last edited by Chaos Residue; Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:56am
Just Chill Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:57am 
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
an artistic play of how the original character designer wanted her to look.

In that case I would still like to know if it was really in Tetsuya Nomura's favor to do that change.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
That's my proof that siren isn't censored
I think we need no proof for that.
As she wasn't ever uncensored.

The topic header is misleading that's true.

They should rather have written "Siren's body covering got unnecessarily enhanced" or similar like that.






Furthermore if a model change happen, it's just normal that people talk about and make their assumptions as long as the developer doesn't talk about.

We only have Tetsuya Nomura's interview from over 20 years ago regarding the ORIGINAL look of the G.F.s.
Does he still work at Squenix and was it really himself who changed the model?

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
I think squalls in game model fits the look of everyone else as well, if he looked like his FMV he would look out of place... If that makes sense?

It doesn't to me, sorry. :(

Zell looks a lo better like his FMV model, Selphie, Quistis and Irvine too.
Rinoa has now too brown and big eyes compared to her FMV model.

Sure, the rendered model cannot look exactly like the FMV model because the engine is not capable to render something like that.

But it at least should look similar to keep it consistent.
Last edited by Just Chill; Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:00am
Of course it's censorship. How are people still claiming it's not in this thread?

Chaos Residue Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:59am 
Originally posted by The sap is rising!:
Of course it's censorship. How are people still claiming it's not in this thread?

If you chose not to read, that's on you. Your post is pointless as you've contributed nothing, and you've read/comprehended nothing. Two posts before yours I gave the reasons this does not appear to be censorship.
Dwarvenhobble Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:15am 
Originally posted by OJ COPACABANNA:
The original wasn't even bush you cucks, it was obviously a clamshell bikini. No full frontal before, and none now. Therefore, no censorship. Rather, an improvement of character design that looks objectively nicer and more colorful. ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Oh sure like the Council of Trent "improved" all those paintings in the 1530s.........

Originally posted by Acadia:
So giving Siren more dress is censoring yet Shiva is still the same? I think you are wrong the game wasn’t censored or Shiva would not be the same.
Censorship isn't always competently done.
Dwarvenhobble Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:19am 
Originally posted by Just Chill:

And even if she just had pubic hair it's not like it's necessary to censor pubic hair. I mean that's just hair.
Normally you censor what's underneath that hair and in the case of Siren her yellow patch (maybe it was a shell or feathers or pubic hair in form of feathers, WHATEVER) it perfectly covered what wouldn't have been save for the age rating.

Oddly under MPAA ratings at one point (I know games are rated by ESRB but it's somewhat relevant here) there was a rule or stipulation that a film could garner a higher age ratings if at any point public hair was visible.
Just Chill Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:25am 
Siren wasn't ever uncensored in any version of FF8, they either decided to redesign Tifa in the FF7 remake not because of censorship, but becasue of realism.

https://kotaku.com/what-tetsuya-nomura-actually-said-about-tifas-breasts-i-1835726320
Originally posted by that article:
there were also directions from our internal ethics committee that as not to make even the most intense action look unnatural it was necessary to bind [Tifa’s] chest.

Bouncing boobs are unnatural! They have to be removed. XD



No seriously I get that Tifa looked a bit... awkward in the original.
http://colourlessopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Untitled-1.png
There are sporty women with a big and real cleavage, but here in that case it's simply ridiculous. XD

Furthermore it requires specific genetic treats to have massive cleavage as a sporty woman.
Simply as being sporty normally burns fat and boobs are mainly covered in fat. The mammary gland is surrounded by fat.
Surely there are also muslces, but fat is the major part of of it.
If a breast would mainly consist of muscle mass, it definitely wouldn't be as soft as a breast is used to be.



Yet again, even if Nomura used "internal ethics commitee" in the statement I actually like the change as Tifa would look pretty awkward with such a cleavage doing all these moves.
She's a martial artist and alread in Advent Children she had a lot lesser cleavage and it fit her pretty well.




Yet, there is still no proper reason for the change of Siren.
It would have been even easier to enhance her shell (that covering she previously had) by adding feathers or something there, instead of adding a whole new skirt.
Adding such a new assset to a model is definitely more difficult than just enhancing it.
Last edited by Just Chill; Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:27am
Dwarvenhobble Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:30am 
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:

I don't think its censorship, I get called an SJW censor apologist which is laughable if anyone in here knew me... This thread got way out of hand about 15 pages ago and any respectable mod would have seen that.

Funny I've been called:

An Idiot
Butthurt
Right Wing
A communist
A Weeb
A hobo
A Doomspeaker
A sexual deviant
Claimed I had poor literacy skills
Implied I was intellectually inferior
Claimed I was lying but refused to say which specific example was the lie
Accusing of Sophistry
and a fascist.

Dwarvenhobble Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:31am 
Originally posted by Just Chill:
Siren wasn't ever uncensored in any version of FF8, they either decided to redesign Tifa in the FF7 remake not because of censorship, but becasue of realism.

https://kotaku.com/what-tetsuya-nomura-actually-said-about-tifas-breasts-i-1835726320
Originally posted by that article:
there were also directions from our internal ethics committee that as not to make even the most intense action look unnatural it was necessary to bind [Tifa’s] chest.

Bouncing boobs are unnatural! They have to be removed. XD



No seriously I get that Tifa looked a bit... awkward in the original.
http://colourlessopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Untitled-1.png
There are sporty women with a big and real cleavage, but here in that case it's simply ridiculous. XD

Furthermore it requires specific genetic treats to have massive cleavage as a sporty woman.
Simply as being sporty normally burns fat and boobs are mainly covered in fat. The mammary gland is surrounded by fat.
Surely there are also muslces, but fat is the major part of of it.
If a breast would mainly consist of muscle mass, it definitely wouldn't be as soft as a breast is used to be.



Yet again, even if Nomura used "internal ethics commitee" in the statement I actually like the change as Tifa would look pretty awkward with such a cleavage doing all these moves.
She's a martial artist and alread in Advent Children she had a lot lesser cleavage and it fit her pretty well.




Yet, there is still no proper reason for the change of Siren.
It would have been even easier to enhance her shell (that covering she previously had) by adding feathers or something there, instead of adding a whole new skirt.
Adding such a new assset to a model is definitely more difficult than just enhancing it.
Sure Realism.......... in a world where Cloud fights with a sword bigger than he is and people throw magic spells at one another...............
Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
Originally posted by The sap is rising!:
Of course it's censorship. How are people still claiming it's not in this thread?

If you chose not to read, that's on you. Your post is pointless as you've contributed nothing, and you've read/comprehended nothing. Two posts before yours I gave the reasons this does not appear to be censorship.

I did read your posts. My point stands.
Chaika Trabant Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:34am 
Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
If you're going to censor siren then why not shiva as well? My original thread even had a source link that directed to an article involving the original character designer from 1998 where he stated (in 1998) that all GFs were intended to be naked (no clothes) and that siren was intended to have fathers instead of hair.
From one of my previous post:
Well, people tend to forget that censorship can be a slow process that happen little by little instead of being something big that will happen suddenly, doing too much at once would make your intents clear and raise too much criticism.


Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
That's my proof that siren isn't censored and instead is an artistic play of how the original character designer wanted her to look..
In the very same post, you've literally said that the designr wanted the GF to be naked, adding even more clothes goes against that.


Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
So again prove to me using refutable offical evidence from anyone at Square Enix that she has been censored.
See above and reread yourself.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
How does being called an SJW mean that I have a communication problem? I got called an SJW for saying this game isn't censored, which part of that is my fault? Or are you saying being called an SJW is justified because my opinion?
It's easy for people on here to just blame SJWs because of things they don't like.
Maybe you are, maybe you aren't but in the end, people will judge you based on what you post.
Don't want that? Don't post at all.

Originally posted by Mancunian Prophecy:
Also I gave you a childish reply to a childish accusation.
Which was? I literally asked several questions and you did not answer any of them.
But sure, call me childish.




Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the defender.
I cannot prove that 2+2=4, does it mean it's objectively and factually false despite being something commonly used in practical application?


Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
The people crying "censorship!" have provided no proof that there is censorship. But while we can't disprove censorship (because how do you prove something didn't happen?) we can prove that it's unlikely. Here's the proof for that:
The original game did not contain nudity. If it had the game would not have been able to maintain a Teen rating. A "bush" would have still counted as nudity.
The original game already had Siren without a skirt and whether what Siren has between her legs is a bush or a clam is up to anyone's guess. I mean, you have people who legit think Ifrit doesn't have a bush and is wearing clothes instead.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
The original Siren did not contain clothing, but rather everything was covered up with feathers. Source: http://shmuplations.com/ff8/
Originally posted by Tetsuya Nomura:
For the same reason I re-designed Siren from FF4 to not have any clothing, too.
Siren appears as a woman with animalistic features. In place for blonde hair she has golden bird wings extend from her head. Her body is slightly covered by feathers (more so in the Remastered version). She is barefoot and has purple claws. Her eyes are purple and she holds a green harp.
So in your opinion, adding clothes to a character who wasn't supposed to have clothes is something closer to her original intended design?
Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
The change in Siren's design was done by the original artist.
So what? Can you prove that he wasn't ordered to do and say and was instead something done by his own free will.
Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
Shiva was not censored.
Ultimecia was not censored.
See above, censorship is a process, not something that will happen overnight in a big way.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
These are all very strong indicators that this is not censorship. Meanwhile, "your" side has no strong indicators that it's censorship other than "it's different and I have an opinion why"
Not really, these are all questionnable indicators.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
. If the evidence points towards A, why are you people so staunchly crying B?
I don't know, most of your points also rely on assumptions.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
People called me the same thing, and it was after I said I hate SquareEnix and that this was a lazy, garbage job of a remaster. It's not a miscommunication issue, and it's not that we're SJWs. It's that people on this forum attack people who disagree with them. I said "no censorship" and suddenly I'm a "devs white knight", an "SJW", and other more colorful terms.
You can call this game a failure on a technical level and still be a pro/anti SJW, I do not see why those would be mutually exclusive.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
A difference of opinion doesn't make name-calling appropriate, especially when there's more evidence for our opinion that it's not censorship than for the people saying it is censorship.
I did not justify the name-calling, feel free to look at my post, I've never called anyone a SJW here.
I just explained why people may act as they do.

Originally posted by Chaos Residue:
And your post is ridiculous. You're blaming the victim without doing any research.
No? the victims here are the (potential) customers, not the poor dev who can't do anything wrong but did anyway, at least on a technical level by your own admission.

Also I thought you didn't want to talk to me anymore as you suddenly labelled me as a troll out of nowhere because you asked people to believe you unconditionally?
Just Chill Sep 16, 2019 @ 6:52am 
Originally posted by Dwarvenhobble:
Sure Realism.......... in a world where Cloud fights with a sword bigger than he is and people throw magic spells at one another...............

The thing is Cloud doesn't have 2 big fat balls as breasts that are meant to bounce around uncontrolled when not properly affixed (sports bra or something). ;)

It was very unlikely that they would have taken over the breast size for Tifa.
Have you even watched the image I linked?
I literally think that Tifa looked ridiculous and just got modelled like that as Lara Croft was a big thing in that day.
And even Lara had an unfavourable size, regarding what she was actually doing.

As I said, some women have the genetic traits that many of the fat they add to their body get actually added to the breasts.
But I doubt that this was on the mind of the designers, when they made these models. :P



Yet lets not go too much to off-topic.

I actually just wanted to quote that it really appears that even Tetsuya Nomura got supervised by their internal ethics commitee.

Except of maybe previously designing Tifa in a pretty inapropriate way regarding of what kind of character she has and what actions she performs, I don't think there was anything wrong with any of the design choices made in any original FF.
< >
Showing 586-600 of 702 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 30, 2019 @ 9:57am
Posts: 702