Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is coming from me as someone who loves playing both games and has grown up with them.
I love Age of Empires a lot... but this is simply not worth your money or time, if you don't come back to it for old times sake.
Age of Empires II is very much worth getting though.
Age of Empires: DE (this one)
plays from roughly 3000 B.C to around 300 A.D (AOE2 starts after this)
There's less units, less buildings, less civilisations and less maps than in II.
Playing Multiplayer is barely worth it because there are major balancing problems and water maps are only about chucking ships against each other until one player runs out of wood.
Additionally, you can't record your games as it is now - and I doubt this will be changed.
---
Gameplay is a lot... simpler, for a lack of a better word.
But I also like this game and think it's worth picking up, especially if it's on sale.