Civvie11 fans exposed as sheeple

[Green Skeleton]

https://i.imgur.com/gebt3Rc.png

Lol

Basically, GGGManlives puts out a review that says the Blood port is good, everyone like GGGman's video - now Civvie puts out one of his videos, and now everyone says the GGG man bad like the NPCs they are

Also Civvie only likes Blood because it's not as "problematic" as Duke Nukem, the absolute spudbrain.

This isn't me as a fanboy of GGGmanlives either, because he's just flat out wrong about Redneck Rampage

[MeanJohnRambo]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Deer Trap:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Green Skeleton:

A Civvie fanboy agrees with Civvie - imagine my shock.

This, along with using "sheeple" as an attack on people who don't like something you do is meaningless and a terrible way to try to prove a point.

Civvie's video had about 10% subjectivity with 90% bugs he had. Legitimately wonky crap happening ingame and crashes.

It's a seriously terrible argument to say "fanboy attack luls" when the video Civvie posted is showing why this remaster has objective design flaws.

That's like saying "Everyone liked the bible until these science and philosophy sheeple looked at the evidence and used their brains to make a educated decision about it, what a bunch of mindless fanboys LOLZ"

PS-Civvie likes Blood because he thinks it's the most fun game. He's said this multiple times. I've played DOOM, Duke3D AND Blood and I agree. Duke will always be my favorite because of nostalgia but Blood is pretty much objectively more enjoyable to play.

Enjoyment is by nature subjective, not objective How could you... oh wait I forgot Civvie does your thinking for you. Nevermind

[that's what she said]

civvie is too harsh. ggg is too positive because he is not inane fanboy. Most people won't even notice half the things he mentioned. Also people with different experience tend to have different opinions and value different things. This is getting out of hand. there isn't even a drama. Civvie didn't even calling out ggg, just an innocent joke.

Jeez we were asking for this game for a decade, and all 'sourceports' were pathetic at best. GDX is still hot trash. People are like 'omg bugs', but this is the first time Blood is completely playable hassle-free, feature-complete and gameplay is almost authentic. It can't care less about 1-to-1 recreation if I can get the same experience hassle free. Sure, there is some bugs, but they aren't detrimental to the overall experience.

Yeah, I got it, the most ungrateful people are fanboys. Don't like it - don't buy it, so devs won't release remasters like that and we'd be stuck with Dosbox. Imagine your favorite game wasn't as popular as Blood - it won't even have any other option then Dosbox. Even such cult classic as Blood only got two absolutely pathetic 'reverse engineered' source ports a decade later.

[MeanJohnRambo]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Nero:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Green Skeleton:

https://i.imgur.com/gebt3Rc.png

Lol

Basically, GGGManlives puts out a review that says the Blood port is good, everyone like GGGman's video - now Civvie puts out one of his videos, and now everyone says the GGG man bad like the NPCs they are

Also Civvie only likes Blood because it's not as "problematic" as Duke Nukem, the absolute spudbrain.

This isn't me as a fanboy of GGGmanlives either, because he's just flat out wrong about Redneck Rampage

Also, people trusted GGG...crap cause it was the first thing on YouTube that was shown.
Nobody knew better at this time and went to the store.
Now everybody (including Civvie) sees how stupid G...crap is, cause he doesn't talk about anything that's wrong with this title.
And on top of that, he claims that he has played this version for 20 hours before making the review.... so basically, he is even too stupid to notice anything wrong with this title, or he just lies to his viewers for $ome $stupid rea$on.

I'm not taking a side but YouTube reeks of toxic fanboyism. Someone pledges allegiance to their "Computer God" (in this case "Civvie"), then anyone who dares contradict that person is immediately the enemy. The fanboys then descend upon the heretic, hurling insults and casting blame. I cringed hard when I perused the comments section on this Civvie video. I couldn't tell if people just liked him or wanted to have sex with him. No doubt his followers are mostly men. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just saying

[DOFR]

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

The fanboys then descend upon the heretic, hurling insults and casting blame.

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

oh wait I forgot Civvie does your thinking for you

I mean, at least uphold yourself to your own standards and stop insulting people yourself.

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

I couldn't tell if people just liked him or wanted to have sex with him. No doubt his followers are mostly men. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just saying

And why are you "just saying" that? Because I can't see the point of mentioning that his followers are mostly men in this context.

[excelatrate]

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Deer Trap:

This, along with using "sheeple" as an attack on people who don't like something you do is meaningless and a terrible way to try to prove a point.

Civvie's video had about 10% subjectivity with 90% bugs he had. Legitimately wonky crap happening ingame and crashes.

It's a seriously terrible argument to say "fanboy attack luls" when the video Civvie posted is showing why this remaster has objective design flaws.

That's like saying "Everyone liked the bible until these science and philosophy sheeple looked at the evidence and used their brains to make a educated decision about it, what a bunch of mindless fanboys LOLZ"

PS-Civvie likes Blood because he thinks it's the most fun game. He's said this multiple times. I've played DOOM, Duke3D AND Blood and I agree. Duke will always be my favorite because of nostalgia but Blood is PRETTY MUCH objectively more enjoyable to play.

Enjoyment is by nature subjective, not objective How could you... oh wait I forgot Civvie does your thinking for you. Nevermind

Did you miss the "pretty much" before the statement? That's your harshest comeback to what I said? Cool, nice attempt at trolling!

[MeanJohnRambo]

Opprinnelig skrevet av DOFR:

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

The fanboys then descend upon the heretic, hurling insults and casting blame.

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

oh wait I forgot Civvie does your thinking for you

I mean, at least uphold yourself to your own standards and stop insulting people yourself.

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

I couldn't tell if people just liked him or wanted to have sex with him. No doubt his followers are mostly men. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just saying

And why are you "just saying" that? Because I can't see the point of mentioning that his followers are mostly men in this context.

I was just pointing it out because while it's perfectly natural, it's not the norm and I found it rather odd. What are you a homophobe? Get off my case. If any of these people knew him in real life, let's just say the platonic element of their friendship would fade very quickly judging by the glowing comments on his videos

[excelatrate]

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

Opprinnelig skrevet av DOFR:

I mean, at least uphold yourself to your own standards and stop insulting people yourself.

And why are you "just saying" that? Because I can't see the point of mentioning that his followers are mostly men in this context.

I was just pointing it out because while it's perfectly natural, it's not the norm and I found it rather odd. What are you a homophobe? Get off my case. If any of these people knew him in real life, let's just say the platonic element of their friendship would fade very quickly judging by the glowing comments on his videos

Wow, you are a super funny edgelord. Gay people are funny because they are gay. Love the Columbine callback on your HATRED review. I can tell that you are a very hillarious person who loves to make people angry because its a funny XD

[DOFR]

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

I was just pointing it out because while it's perfectly natural, it's not the norm and I found it rather odd. What are you a homophobe? Get off my case. If any of these people knew him in real life, let's just say the platonic element of their friendship would fade very quickly judging by the glowing comments on his videos

Wait... So you actually meant that when you've said that you think they want to have sex with him? I rationally thought that it's just a hyperbolic statement that is commonly used alongside with "stop sucking his ♥♥♥♥" to point out fanatic's behavior. Well, then you are just delusional to think so.
Also the hell was that question about me being a homophobe? How did you come to that conclusion or was that just an insult hidden behind a question mark?

[excelatrate]

Opprinnelig skrevet av DOFR:

Opprinnelig skrevet av MeanJohnRambo:

I was just pointing it out because while it's perfectly natural, it's not the norm and I found it rather odd. What are you a homophobe? Get off my case. If any of these people knew him in real life, let's just say the platonic element of their friendship would fade very quickly judging by the glowing comments on his videos

Wait... So you actually meant that when you've said that you really think they want to have sex with him? I rationally thought that it's just a hyperbolic statement that is commonly used alongside with "stop sucking his ♥♥♥♥" to point out fanatic's behavior. Well, then you are just delusional to think so.
Also the hell was that question about me being a homophobe? How did you come to that conclusion or was that just an insult hidden behind a question mark?

Dude, look at his profile and reviews. Very low effort troll with no sparks of creativity or originality. Just basic, banal "gay huehue" and schoolshooter worship.

The kind of person who somehow is able to give trolls a bad name. Man, trolling used to be hillarious, wholesome and fun.

Stop taking him seriously.

[Saint Tivadar]

I don't trust GGG to talk about the technical aspect accurately.

GGG said that BloodGDX is a bad sourceport when it can play vanilla Blood demos without error or desync which is a milestone in terms of accuracy. To understand why vanilla demo replays are such an important thing when determining how accurate a sourceport is, QZdoom which is a good sourceport of Doom that adds new features is not able to playback vanilla Doom demos whilst Chocolate Doom which is a recreation/preservation effort for vanilla Doom is able to playback vanilla Doom demos. Hence why factually GGG is wrong when he claims BloodGDX is an inaccurate sourceport, GGG may know a lot about how good an FPS game feels but he lacks knowledge about the technical aspect.

[DOFR]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Deer Trap:

Opprinnelig skrevet av DOFR:

Wait... So you actually meant that when you've said that you really think they want to have sex with him? I rationally thought that it's just a hyperbolic statement that is commonly used alongside with "stop sucking his ♥♥♥♥" to point out fanatic's behavior. Well, then you are just delusional to think so.
Also the hell was that question about me being a homophobe? How did you come to that conclusion or was that just an insult hidden behind a question mark?

Dude, look at his profile and reviews. Very low effort troll with no sparks of creativity or originality. Just basic, banal "gay huehue" and schoolshooter worship.

Stop taking him seriously.

Usually I'm the one to point such things out... Losing my grip I guess. Thanks for the heads up

[excelatrate]

Opprinnelig skrevet av DOFR:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Deer Trap:

Dude, look at his profile and reviews. Very low effort troll with no sparks of creativity or originality. Just basic, banal "gay huehue" and schoolshooter worship.

Stop taking him seriously.

Usually I'm the one to point such things out... Losing my grip I guess. Thanks for the heads up

It's all good, I did get a single chuckle from him though using the word "toxic" then looking at his profile.

+1 to NPC trolls, even procedurally generated trolling can occasionally cause a XD

[Smufius]

Ah, Youtube drama. My favourite.

[Panc]

I agree, stop listening to some youtubers as some kind of god-like figure, it's really embarrassing.
How they'll play and enjoy the game is most likely different from how you'll enjoy the game.
You can still enjoy watching those videos to gain different opinions about the game, but take it with a grain of salt. Their opinions aren't your opinions. You should experience and think about it yourself when it comes to your opinion.

"I think dis game bad cuz my fave youtuber said so and he do no wrong!!!!!"
you know how stupid this sounds, right?

In my opinion, It's not a greatest remaster, nor worst remaster. It's an ok remaster, above average, considering original blood and blood ports weren't bug-free either. From my experience I haven't faced anything ridiculously bad, and I was playing nBlood last month.

[Billy Blaze]

Opprinnelig skrevet av panc:

I agree, stop listening to some youtubers as some kind of god-like figure, it's really embarrassing.
How they'll play and enjoy the game is most likely different from how you'll enjoy the game.
You can still enjoy watching those videos to gain different opinions about the game, but take it with a grain of salt. Their opinions aren't your opinions. You should experience and think about it yourself when it comes to your opinion.

"I think dis game bad cuz my fave youtuber said so and he do no wrong!!!!!"
you know how stupid this sounds, right?

In my opinion, It's not a greatest remaster, nor worst remaster. It's an ok remaster, above average, considering original blood and blood ports weren't bug-free either. From my experience I haven't faced anything ridiculously bad, and I was playing nBlood last month.

It's just interesting how everyone just misses the point.
It isn't about if one YouTuber likes this game and another YouTuber doesn't like it.

It's about that a Reviewer absolutely doesn't mention the bugs and what's wrong about the game.
Even if these things are just minor to him, but GGG...crap has to inform everyone about the shortcomings, so everyone can decide if it's a dealbreaker or not.
But instead, the GGG...crap video was just an advertisement for the game, not a Review.