Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Enjoyment is by nature subjective, not objective
Jeez we were asking for this game for a decade, and all 'sourceports' were pathetic at best. GDX is still hot trash. People are like 'omg bugs', but this is the first time Blood is completely playable hassle-free, feature-complete and gameplay is almost authentic. It can't care less about 1-to-1 recreation if I can get the same experience hassle free. Sure, there is some bugs, but they aren't detrimental to the overall experience.
Yeah, I got it, the most ungrateful people are fanboys. Don't like it - don't buy it, so devs won't release remasters like that and we'd be stuck with Dosbox. Imagine your favorite game wasn't as popular as Blood - it won't even have any other option then Dosbox. Even such cult classic as Blood only got two absolutely pathetic 'reverse engineered' source ports a decade later.
I'm not taking a side but YouTube reeks of toxic fanboyism. Someone pledges allegiance to their "Computer God" (in this case "Civvie"), then anyone who dares contradict that person is immediately the enemy. The fanboys then descend upon the heretic, hurling insults and casting blame. I cringed hard when I perused the comments section on this Civvie video. I couldn't tell if people just liked him or wanted to have sex with him. No doubt his followers are mostly men. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just saying
And why are you "just saying" that? Because I can't see the point of mentioning that his followers are mostly men in this context.
Did you miss the "pretty much" before the statement? That's your harshest comeback to what I said? Cool, nice attempt at trolling!
I was just pointing it out because while it's perfectly natural, it's not the norm and I found it rather odd. What are you a homophobe? Get off my case. If any of these people knew him in real life, let's just say the platonic element of their friendship would fade very quickly judging by the glowing comments on his videos
Wow, you are a super funny edgelord. Gay people are funny because they are gay. Love the Columbine callback on your HATRED review. I can tell that you are a very hillarious person who loves to make people angry because its a funny XD
Also the hell was that question about me being a homophobe? How did you come to that conclusion or was that just an insult hidden behind a question mark?
Dude, look at his profile and reviews. Very low effort troll with no sparks of creativity or originality. Just basic, banal "gay huehue" and schoolshooter worship.
The kind of person who somehow is able to give trolls a bad name. Man, trolling used to be hillarious, wholesome and fun.
Stop taking him seriously.
GGG said that BloodGDX is a bad sourceport when it can play vanilla Blood demos without error or desync which is a milestone in terms of accuracy. To understand why vanilla demo replays are such an important thing when determining how accurate a sourceport is, QZdoom which is a good sourceport of Doom that adds new features is not able to playback vanilla Doom demos whilst Chocolate Doom which is a recreation/preservation effort for vanilla Doom is able to playback vanilla Doom demos. Hence why factually GGG is wrong when he claims BloodGDX is an inaccurate sourceport, GGG may know a lot about how good an FPS game feels but he lacks knowledge about the technical aspect.
It's all good, I did get a single chuckle from him though using the word "toxic" then looking at his profile.
+1 to NPC trolls, even procedurally generated trolling can occasionally cause a XD
How they'll play and enjoy the game is most likely different from how you'll enjoy the game.
You can still enjoy watching those videos to gain different opinions about the game, but take it with a grain of salt. Their opinions aren't your opinions. You should experience and think about it yourself when it comes to your opinion.
"I think dis game bad cuz my fave youtuber said so and he do no wrong!!!!!"
you know how stupid this sounds, right?
In my opinion, It's not a greatest remaster, nor worst remaster. It's an ok remaster, above average, considering original blood and blood ports weren't bug-free either. From my experience I haven't faced anything ridiculously bad, and I was playing nBlood last month.
It's just interesting how everyone just misses the point.
It isn't about if one YouTuber likes this game and another YouTuber doesn't like it.
It's about that a Reviewer absolutely doesn't mention the bugs and what's wrong about the game.
Even if these things are just minor to him, but GGG...crap has to inform everyone about the shortcomings, so everyone can decide if it's a dealbreaker or not.
But instead, the GGG...crap video was just an advertisement for the game, not a Review.