Will this run on my computer?

[BananaJane]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/567064760856870928/649813184215121943/PC.JPG

I can run 4 at a good framerate just fine but the game crashes extremely often

[Razgriz]

i dont know, this game is very demand , in cpu at least, and you have intel HD so big nope

[Xsonic]

much demand

[BananaJane]

Why is it so demanding when none of the other games were, the first one ran on ps2 for god's sake

[Sir Duckyweather]

If you can run EDF 4.1 just fine I think EDF 5 ought to be decent as well. I mean it's the same engine (I think) and the graphics aren't hugely improved, though there is a lot of fluid splatter and dismemberment to account for.

[ValerianN]

Originally posted by BananaJane:

Why is it so demanding when none of the other games were, the first one ran on ps2 for god's sake

Jeez, I don't know, the first Doom ran on a 486 for god's sake, so why does Doom 2016 require an i5-2400 and GTX 670?

[BlueBomber]

Try download a copy from the internet, game is only around 4GB in many repack sites.
Its better to try it yourself, the best way to know how well it will run on your machine.

But from my experience 5 has better performance than 4.1 since it fix the memory leak especially on online lobbies. Has zero crashes on 5 while theres a few on 4.1

[BananaJane]

Originally posted by Rookierookie:

Originally posted by BananaJane:

Why is it so demanding when none of the other games were, the first one ran on ps2 for god's sake

Jeez, I don't know, the first Doom ran on a 486 for god's sake, so why does Doom 2016 require an i5-2400 and GTX 670?

EDF 5 didn't come out 30 years after EDF 4

[BananaJane]

Originally posted by BlueBomber:

Try download a copy from the internet, game is only around 4GB in many repack sites.
Its better to try it yourself, the best way to know how well it will run on your machine.

But from my experience 5 has better performance than 4.1 since it fix the memory leak especially on online lobbies. Has zero crashes on 5 while theres a few on 4.1

The leak might have been what was causing all my crashing in 4

[ValerianN]

Originally posted by BananaJane:

Originally posted by Rookierookie:

Jeez, I don't know, the first Doom ran on a 486 for god's sake, so why does Doom 2016 require an i5-2400 and GTX 670?

EDF 5 didn't come out 30 years after EDF 4

You were talking about the first game. Sure it's not 30 years, it's ONLY been 17 years.

[Gondola]

Originally posted by BananaJane:

Why is it so demanding when none of the other games were, the first one ran on ps2 for god's sake

The game isnt that demanding, your PC doesnt have a dedicated GPU, so your gonna have trouble running any modern game. With a intel 4600 HD, you really cant complain. Even something like a GT 710 would improve your gaming experience, they run about 60 dollars. In fact, here is one for 52 dollars

https://www.amazon.com/MSI-GT-710-2GD3-LP/dp/B01DOFD0G8/ref=sr_1_8?keywords=gtx+920&qid=1584245704&s=electronics&sr=1-8


Its not gonna be running anything at max settings, but its way better than no GPU.

Id recommend this:

https://www.amazon.com/ZOTAC-GeForce-DirectX-Profile-ZT-P10300A-10L/dp/B0711NWFJX/ref=pd_sbs_147_t_1/131-2665488-2502736?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B0711NWFJX&pd_rd_r=875eb19b-444b-44f4-8210-f77c2746acb0&pd_rd_w=ejfXc&pd_rd_wg=etsnf&pf_rd_p=5cfcfe89-300f-47d2-b1ad-a4e27203a02a&pf_rd_r=7M9053PE4N4PRJB6S9BZ&psc=1&refRID=7M9053PE4N4PRJB6S9BZ

Its a much better deal and its 30 dollars more, but you will get over 300% better performance than a gt 710 and dx12 / Vulcan support.

Here is a comparision to your 4600HD 417% increase to performance.

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GT-1030-vs-Intel-HD-4600-Desktop-125-GHz/m283726vs2168