Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That is currently my issue with the series and what has killed a lot of games for me, SP games do not keep their interest for very long.
Much better to share the experience, and if it was like CSD 1 where we could be two people taking on the tasks as they came in, would be perfect.
I don't think that it need a Multiplayer for this Game. It didn't kill the experience in this game to play alone, it's more fun to play for myself in CSD.
CSD2 now has Steam Remote Play Together, so it looks like it might be possible for this game too
that was my first thought when i saw the news yesterday.
:) this makes me happy.
In CSD2, unlike CSD1, the coop mode is split screen, which in my opinion makes the great artwork less appealing for me and my wife (half size being too small in the screen to see the full details of each food/recipe).
I'm saying this because I and my wife are both casual players, and are more keen to see the artwork during playing rather than busy performing muscle memory.
Background: we always think that we like CSD1's coop system better where one of us can take time to appreciate the great artwork.