This game has been Greenlit by the Community!

The community has shown their interest in this game. Valve has reached out to this developer to start moving things toward release on Steam.

Stonehearth
NCDarkness May 24, 2013 @ 5:39am
Co-op Opinions
Of the two major Co-op camps, which do you support more?

1) One city, multiple players, all sharing the same resources and units - basically single player with multiple users.

2) Each player has their own settlers and can make their own cities, acting together for mutual defense and trade - basically like most city building games (Civilization, Age of Empires, Master of Orion, etc).
Showing 1-15 of 134 comments
< >
[TF72] tompou6 May 24, 2013 @ 11:36am 
I would have to go with 2. due to the fact that sharing a city can get very hetic and could cause people to stop playing coop because of stalemate on issues.
Supermunch1 May 24, 2013 @ 1:40pm 
well this sounds like a very interesting consept due to how funny it could be when you play with freinds.
DR.Ceasers Palace MD May 24, 2013 @ 1:43pm 
i like 2 but you should be aloud to fight each other if you wish
[ok] Uber Cookie May 24, 2013 @ 1:56pm 
I think I would personally be in the second camp as well, more because you could always expand your settlements to kind of merge/work together, while if you wanted to split up you could. Seems to offer more to the whole picture and makes worrying about who runs what less confusing.
[TF72] tompou6 May 24, 2013 @ 2:04pm 
[ok] Bob gave they explanation I made a lot less confuesing XD
Last edited by [TF72] tompou6; May 24, 2013 @ 2:04pm
Howie May 24, 2013 @ 2:29pm 
it would be really fun to work together with everyone then stab them in the back when they least expect it
[TF72] tompou6 May 24, 2013 @ 2:32pm 
ya... no
Last edited by [TF72] tompou6; May 24, 2013 @ 2:32pm
Zinal May 24, 2013 @ 2:52pm 
I suggest both.. Kinda like Anno style. You can play alone against other players, or in a team where you share resources with your teammates.
[TF72] tompou6 May 24, 2013 @ 3:08pm 
love it
Mailmann May 24, 2013 @ 3:53pm 
I prefer that everyone has their own city/kingdom to manage and everyone works with eachother, or against eachother ;), to accomplish our goals. However, "Why not both?" I say. ;)
William_De_Wolf May 24, 2013 @ 7:16pm 
I would go with both too, it would be cool if peolpe could make "Countries" with each other, them split them up with civil wars if them wanted too, or betray one another some way. Or they could just go lone wolf, make peace or war when they want to or when its necessary.
Last edited by William_De_Wolf; May 24, 2013 @ 7:23pm
Jake May 24, 2013 @ 10:19pm 
Two please. I enjoy not sharing with my friends and thats why they love me.
Danish May 24, 2013 @ 10:28pm 
I say you guys do both if possible.You know give us more options.
Last edited by Danish; May 24, 2013 @ 10:29pm
Kaepora May 24, 2013 @ 10:56pm 
I support number 1 a bit more however I feel both should be implemented.
Iwan_4_ May 25, 2013 @ 12:24am 
I think number 2 because it will give players to forge their own path
Showing 1-15 of 134 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50