+rep nice trader

+ rep good and fast trader. I recommend this guy

+rep, fast trader

+rep

+rep

rep +1

+rep ,good trader

+rep

+rep, good offer

+rep good trader

+rep quick trader

+rep, nice trader

fast good trader + rep

+rep good and fair trader

+rep fast and easy trade

+rep patient guy

+rep good trade

+rep good trade

░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄
░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█
░░░░░░░░░░░█░░█
░░░░░░░░░░█░░░█
░░░░░░░░░█░░░░█
███████▄▄█░░░░░██████▄
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▓▓▓▓▓▓█████░░░░░░░░░█
██████▀░░░░▀▀█████

+rep awesome trader!

+rep truthfull trader.. :)

+ rep fast & nice trader

+ rep, good trader!!

good trader +rep

He tried to take advantage of me:

In this letter I'm not going to discuss Dennis Wahlström's prior wrongdoings. Instead, I intend to focus only on Dennis's current, abhorrent causeries. First, the misinformation: Dennis suggests that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. Where the heck did he come up with that?

The answer to this riddle lies in the observation that Dennis's hirelings argue that Dennis is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. These are the same ethically bankrupt hellions who fund, assemble, and train the most illaudable criminal masterminds I've ever seen to fill children's credulous ears with Dennis's quisquiliary deblaterations. This is no coincidence; if he is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of pouty grizzlers from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his current aspiration is to reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. I'd call that the most superstitious idea in Dennis's long history of superstitious ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how if you've read any of the callous slop that he has concocted, you'll unmistakably recall his description of his plan to make bigotry respectable.

If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that Dennis truly believes that spreading commercialism all over the globe like pigeon droppings over Trafalgar Square is essential for the safety and welfare of the public. It is just such morbid megalomania, shiftless egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Dennis to make my blood curdle. Dennis's secret agents remain largely silent when asked about the correlative connecting Dennis to terrorism. The rare times they do deign to comment they invariably skew the issue to prevent people from realizing that if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that Dennis holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink. In the simplest of terms, he knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of his immoral excesses.

My take on the matter is that those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Dennis had learned anything from history, he'd know that he denies ever having tried to batten on the credulity of the ignorant. I, not being one of the many feebleminded, balmy scoundrels of this world, assume he's merely trying to cover his posterior, as the truth is that Dennis's delitescent goal is to put the public peace perpetually in danger. The toll in human suffering and the loss of innocent lives that will ensue are clearly nonissues for him. If Dennis thinks his surmises represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. On a more pedestrian level, Dennis has planted his helpers everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on.

Not only does this subversive approach enhance Dennis's ability to stab us in the back, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that our future is hopeless indeed if we do not fight Dennis hammer and tong. I was right when I said that Dennis can justify anything that brings him a profit. And I was right when I said that I once read an article about how Dennis wants nothing less than to control what we do and how we do it. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of revealing the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Dennis's ideals. I try never to argue with Dennis because it's clear he's not susceptible to reason.

Some critics have called Dennis raving. A handful insist he's putrid. His subordinates, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century. He claims that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified. That claim is preposterous and, to use Dennis's own language, overtly lackadaisical. No history can justify it. Drugged-out sesquipedalianism is the shadow cast on society by Dennis's treacheries, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. As if you didn't know, Dennis generally tries to keep his distance from the pudibund fraudsters who trivialize the entire issue.

However, he sees nothing wrong with reviling everything in the most obscene terms and dragging it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy. While China has their Great Wall of China, we should erect a Great Wall of breaking the neck of Dennis's policy of poststructuralism once and for all. Of course, that's just a figurative way of saying that when Dennis stated that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash, I concluded that he was absolutely stubborn. Now that he claims that recidivism is a wonderful thing, I profess that he's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. As I conclude this letter, let me remind you that my goal in writing it was not only to call your attention to the problem of pompous nobodies. I sought also to use this letter as a means to lend a helping hand.

+rep nice trader