824 people found this review helpful
49 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 0.8 hrs on record
Posted: Feb 5, 2015 @ 9:57am
Updated: Feb 5, 2015 @ 1:10pm

Well....I can't say I am surprised given the large discount for previous owners of the franchise. But, this game is the exact same game as what came before. The exact same buildings, the exact same tools, the exact same interface layout. The only differences I have been able to spot are the new color of the interface (from blue to black) and apparently it has multi-thread support.

I could have just saved the 20 dollars and played Cities XL, and gotten the exact same experience. It is a bit sad that they repackaged an old game and sold it for so much while promising us "tons of new features". Maybe a ton has a different weight value wherever this developer is located.


Edit: Due to some legit points made in the comments section of this review I've decided to make an edit.

Old players: Don't buy it, unless you play it every day, then you'll have bought it anyway.

New Players: I would characterize this game as more of a City Editor instead of more of a city sim in the manner of the old SimCitys. In my opinion, this game is just too easy to plop whatever you want down, and watch it build itself. Yes, you can build a massive city in many of the ways you want. But if you want to start with a small town, and work your ass off to turn it into a bustling metropolis after hours and hours of fun gameplay, and then have to deal with sprawl, aging infrastructure, and urban blight....then this is not the game for you.

To that end, I would characterize this game as a pretty boring way to spend an evening as you just point and plop whatever you want or need and then watch the grey boxes go around your city because you don't want to view your city one street at a time.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
22 Comments
chugalug Feb 6, 2015 @ 1:49pm 
You sound like all the other simcity fanboys.
zmakad Feb 6, 2015 @ 7:43am 
"The main issue was multi-core support, they fixed that as promised and then that's not enough"

"no shit sherlock.. we all know its the same damn game.. its just on a better engine"

Is it just me or are some people suggesting that single-digit fps are really the rage nowadays?

**this comment was brought to you on the basis of actual research prior to blindly buying.
Bengahehe Feb 6, 2015 @ 7:17am 
SHOULD BE HAVE LAW AGAINST THAT.THIS WAS A SCAM. THIS WAS A CRIME.
Smelly Kitten Feb 6, 2015 @ 1:30am 
This game and the ones before it are totally shite, just wait for Cities Skylines OP edit that into your review I'm not a dumbass shit brain and didn't waste my money on it unlike yourself lmfao!
Nabbs1 Feb 5, 2015 @ 11:31pm 
The sad part is steam letting them sell the same shit with a new name
The Pain Feb 5, 2015 @ 11:15pm 
Maybe it launches, unlike CitiesXL
Reun Feb 5, 2015 @ 9:06pm 
In the second to last paragraph you mention a hypothetical game which is interresting and challenging all along. I would be insterested in playing such a game, does any currently exist ? And a modern one if possible, I'd rather not play an old game that has trouble running on my modern PC. I heard the new Sim City is quite shallow, and I played Anno 2070 which didn't feel very deep either.
The doctor is in Feb 5, 2015 @ 7:43pm 
yes its mostly old game with improved engine, multicore support, new ui, steam integration (including workshop) and some new content, ect.. great for people who love playing cities xl and want to build larger, more complex cities while maintaing good framerate and who want steam workshop to share their work and to get custom content easily
Fenkku Feb 5, 2015 @ 6:57pm 
Wow, coming from Sim City, I've always wondered what kind of a game Cities XL is, and you managed to give the exact description I required. Kudos for most useful review I've ever read.
NasiKucing Feb 5, 2015 @ 5:21pm 
wow...iam really glad iam not pre-order this, thanks for the review mate, save me my money~