368 people found this review helpful
20 people found this review funny
3
3
4
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 5.1 hrs on record
Posted: Sep 20, 2015 @ 9:03am
Updated: Mar 22, 2016 @ 12:40am

The perfect word that comes to mind with TY 4 is the same word for the Rocket Knight reboot: Bittersweet.

If you are a die-hard fan, you'll probably put up with this game's more glaring issues. This game is not bad; it's very derivative of the genre and mediocre as a result, which is sad because I am going to suggest some ideas that might have had better execution.

At the end of the day, people will ultimately forget TY 4 now that Krome has started remastering the first three games on Steam. Funding TY 1 - 3 is what the game will be remembered for what it did right.

Proof of claim: http://prntscr.com/8g2dog (In response to a post about an HD collection. TY 1 is now put through Early Access on Steam.)

TY 4 Really Isn't the Next Sequel

This game was originally the Ty the Tasmanian Tiger (10th Anniv) on Windows 8's store and released in 2013. Why the devs decided to call this game the fourth game, I don't know. The cynic in me says hype and marketing.

They could've easily made this game a spin-off title. But that might confuse new people (and yet the plot and the title number 4 will confuse anyone who hasn't played the games). So, the only reason I can think of is because this game takes place after 3, thus it's called 4. (That or the GBA games.)

Looks the Same, But Doesn't Feel the Same

First off, I want to make this distinction: The art of Ty 4 is great, the animation is average. And I think a lot of the gameplay refinements are lacking because of the animation quality. Ty 4 keeps the aesthetics that fits the series.

However, unlike say the spin-off 2D Rayman games, the animation is (or looks like) tweening (moving parts of a still image). This is why the animation looks stiff when you throw your boomerangs or when you swim your whole character moves up and down, not rotating. It makes the game feel stiff when the controls are decent. As a result, the game plays like something I'd find on a site like Newgrounds.

If you don't know what I'm talking about, compare Ty 4 to Rayman here: https://31.media.tumblr.com/3fd0792f9289cf903259dc5fa4e78cf5/tumblr_nk4ozy4YWs1tv9q1qo1_400.gif

Of course UbiArt has a lot more production value behind them than Krome Studios nowadays. That is why the game was made in 2D. I'm not saying the game is bad because it's not pretty enough.

My point is that Ty 4 has competition that offers more visual fidelity, so if they want to grab people's attention they have to do something better, namely gameplay.

A Dimension Lost, Nothing Gained

Which leads me to my biggest problem of the game, there's nothing innovative of its gameplay to warrant a 2D return. There are no unique 2D mechanics or gameplay elements added in to Ty's formula. You still play the same character with the same glide and throw abilities, just in another dimension.

For some fans, that's enough to buy the game; for newcomers, it'll feel like a shallow experience and this game shouldn't be your first exposure to the series.

I don't want to keep mentioning Rayman, but I want to illustrate a point: When Rayman came back to 2D, they added in an ability he couldn't have in the 3D games, wall-running. Not only would that be a camera issue for 3D but it'd probably break the game as a result. In 2D, however, the mechanic was easily implented in the level-design.

This game needed to do something similar. Either new mechanics or make Ty fit a new genre to make his 2D re-debut familiar and interesting to fans, and something worth playing for new players. And what confuses me is that they didn't make this game into a Metroidvania title.

Take, for example, the boomerang system. You are given three plot-specific boomerangs that are needed for the main-fetch quests (Fire, Ice and Shock). They are used to break down their opposite-elemental barrier or interact with an object, and even then they're more often for extra collectables.

The only time this mechanic ever becomes interesting is when you use the Blizzard Rang to freeze a log on a waterfall to make a platform. The game needed more creative uses for these plot-boomerangs, as well as the other ones, if they wanted to make them more enjoyable.

Besides the given ones, there are also purchasable boomerangs (in-game purchases, not real) that give you some benefits. Some more useful than others, while others entirely useless.

You have four or five boomerangs for fighting. The Chaos Boomerang is my personal favorite as it explodes most annoying enemies and takes out multiple enemies with each throw. (It's also between Fire and Ice, which is easy to switch out.) Out of all of the bonus boomerangs, the Cryptic Boomerang is the only one you need to care about (if you want to 100% this game). It lets you find hidden platforms, which you cannot jump on without equiping them even if you know they are there.

All these boomerangs feel added in for flavoring, and you only need to buy them once. They're always in your inventory.

But imagine if the game had open-ended level-design on a 2D environment that required you to EARN those Boomerangs (like the Thundereggs in Ty 1) and then you needed to use those new boomerangs to unlock more with the rewards steadily getting better and more interesting. (Ex. Strider)

Or what if those extra boomerangs were purchasable and you could choose which ones you wanted and it'd shape your experience every time you played, and they had not one or two uses but influenced the bosses you fought or created new types of platforms as a result (i.e. the frozen log)? (Ex. Mega Man or Shovel Knight)

Or what if you had different playable characters (not skins for fans) that had unique abilities and the game required synergy between the team to get through tough obstacles or challenges, which could also be used to traverse the 2D open landscape? (Ex. Castlevania 3) [By the way, I liked all the skins they included; it's cool to have options, I just wished they added replayability.]

All of these ideas are off the top of my head, and any one of them could've made this game more memorable or worth the transition.

A Platformer By Any Other Name

I wasn't expecting anything genre-breaking or the second coming from this game, but I expected something to keep me going besides my nostalgia alone.

The game is a platformer without real punishment. You have infinite lives, you can take multiple hits, you get tons of spawn-points, and there's not even a score-system for superficial punishment. The only thing you lose is time, and the game likes to pad itself out in that regards.

The levels are always "Do Something" three times as separate areas with meaningless side-objectives and extra collectibles for only bragging rights. The collectibles do not unlock anything special, and they're not required unless it's the main objective.

The boss-fights are just there. First one had me stuck because I forgot about the power-attack, but the rest were more obvious. (That final room where you fight Cass is annoying because as the screen rotates you can't easily tell if you can stand where you are or if you'll just fall to the other side of the screen).

I won't touch on the story because it makes no sense to someone who has played only the first game. (Why does Boss Cass hire Kangeroos if he wants to destroy all mammals?)

Needs More Polish
  • Ty's hitbox is unclear at times. (Especially on the whale)
  • Stiff movement
  • If the platform moves fast enough, Ty will slide off his own.
  • When you pick stuff up, Ty can still be hit.
  • Enemies go through the walls on land and sea, sometimes hidden in the background. (Like NES games.) Your attacks do not.
  • SFX on Boomerangs and enemies can be ear-grating. (Same sound effect)
  • Crickey, Ty gets more knockback than me!
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
28 Comments
MostValuedPony Jan 2, 2023 @ 6:54pm 
This was a great review and very accurate to everything I have played so far. I've known of this games existence for years now, but didn't want to play it because I was assuming it was the last Ty game I would ever play, and I didn't want to say goodbye to Ty yet. With the remastered Ty games, it does not have to be the last time I play a Ty game, thankfully. However, I still came to play this one hoping it would give me new, fresh, Ty content. As your review already stated, it falls short of that, and the only reason I kept playing was because of nostalgia. I'm really disappointed because there is so much they could have done but instead they did not do anything new. I always had hope Ty would come back in some capacity someday, but seeing how little care was put into this game, I realize that it probably won't happen. At least the remasters are good though.
slider86 Nov 18, 2022 @ 1:00pm 
Really in depth review. Thanks!
rm -rf / --no--preserve--root Aug 22, 2021 @ 1:24am 
It's amusing to see people criticize someone for giving some depth to a review. I'm sure there would be absolutely no complaints if the review had been less detailed :^)
『Jerrystash』 Aug 14, 2021 @ 5:18am 
:steamthumbsup:
Crysanthium Dec 2, 2018 @ 9:55am 
@tenlinkedparts What exactly is the benefit for writing more compact or smaller reviews?
paintheuniverse Sep 13, 2017 @ 6:47am 
"My novel is good, you just can't U N D E R S T A N D it!!!"

Your review is poorly written and seems very dishonest with its message. That's exactly what I said and exactly what I will continue to say.
Brian (The Schmaltzy Cynic) Jul 9, 2017 @ 10:28pm 
If you found my review helpful or insightful, please consider following me on my curator page to not only check out the best of my written work but also a handy reminder for future purchases on games that may interest you.

My Curator Page
Brian (The Schmaltzy Cynic) Jun 17, 2017 @ 7:46pm 
Oddly enough you only seem to have stumbled across this review written since its launch on Steam. I imagine when TY 1, 2 (in Early Access) and 3 (soon) are all on Steam you're going to see a lot more negative reviews. You can guarentee this as fact.

If you don't like in-depth reviews, then fine; go elsewhere because this is my format and I like to explain things about what are my issues rather than say "I don't like it."
paintheuniverse Jun 17, 2017 @ 7:39pm 
"spinoff 2D Rayman games" tells me everything I need to know about this review and about all of these weird negative reviews cropped up for this game.

Writing a novel does not necessarily mean it's a great review. If anything, writing a novel like this goes against the entire point of Steam reviews. The other commentors don't seem to get this.
Brian (The Schmaltzy Cynic) Sep 9, 2016 @ 9:56pm 
@DonTheDon Wish granted.